• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It could be. It certainly tracks with the separatists’ move into guerilla tactics later in the second Chechen war.

      Out of any time for them to start striking again, this would be it. Russia is stretched thin in manpower and supplies, and their attention is very focused on Ukraine and the West. Their ability to dump resources into the southern Caucus to tamp down a potential Chechen War #3 is definitely going to be limited. And coupled with the completion of Putin’s sham election, it sends a very strong message against Russia’s outward facade of “unity”.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why would they attack random civilians instead of pulling a Wagner move towards the Kreml? Russia already showed that they wouldn’t have much of a resistance to show for it.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          A terror attack requires a couple of guys with small arms. A move towards the Kremlin requires significantly more manpower and equipment.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        What, is Kadyrov not a lapdog anymore? He would seem to be the first hurdle, not a later one. Of course maybe he’s dead or something, idk, i haven’t checked tiktok in a long time.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      They might have beards, hard to tell from the footage I’ve seen.

      May be Islamic terrorism or a bad ol’ fashioned Russian false flag. I doubt Ukrainians or Ukrainian supporting people would do a random terror shooting, they like to be more targeted and the shooting was at random people. There was a foiled group of Islamic terrorists arrested earlier this month, maybe another group.

      We will have to see what Russia says.

      • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, Ukraine hasn’t done anything civilian targeting attacks so i highly doubt it was them. They know how important optics are when it comes to getting international support.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well they targetted civilian targets (the refineries) but have not targetted civilians (i.e. people).

          • borari@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            The distinction is not between civilian targets and military targets, it is between “civilian objects” and “military objectives”. Targeting a civilian infrastructure such as refineries, and even civilian power stations can be considered valid military objectives if they make an effective contribution to military action or offer a definite military advantage. The refineries being hit by Ukraine definitely meet that definition.

            https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/when-are-attacks-civilian-infrastructure-war-crimes-2022-12-16/

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Just pointing out that what Ukraine does not attack is civilians or in your nomeclature “civilian objects”, but unlike what might be understood from the post I was responding to (because it used “civilian” rather than “civilians”), it does attack civilian infrastructure (when it is a “military objective”, as you pointed out).

              Personally I think the attacks on Russian refineries should already been happenning for a long time and I find it’s a disgrace the limitations most European countries and the US placed on Ukranian use of the weapons they provided inside Russia. Strategically it’s ridiculous that Ukraine has had to suffer its infrastructure and its Economy being destroyed whilst Russia needed not at all worry about having it’s productive and economic infrastructure degraded: since Putin doesn’t seem to care at all about human lives, until Ukraine finally made their own weapons with range enough to hit Russian Economic Targets and started targetting Russian refineries, this invasion of his had been almost risk-free.

              • borari@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Ah ok, I misinterpreted your post then. I thought you were insinuating that because refineries are civilian infrastructure Ukraine shouldn’t be targeting them. We’re in agreement here, don’t target actual civilians and slam as many drones as possible into refineries and any other valid targets within Russia.