• QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    The U.S. doesn’t claim to be a paragon of freedom for the CCP or Chinese-owned and operated enterprises lmao

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ah yes, the famous “you’re free as long as you obey me”. Totally not imperialism.

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        What freedoms granted by the Constitution have ever applied to foreign legal entities? And since when did sucking off 200 billion dollar corporations become part of the leftist playbook?

        • Bartsbigbugbag
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2017/01/30/does-the-constitution-protect-non-citizens-judges-say-yes/?sh=c8b4d9f4f1de

          The same way it applied to enemy combatants held at the U.S. base in Guantanamo Bay in a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision, *Boumediene v. Bush, *which held that the basic right of habeas corpus to challenge illegal detentions extends even to non-citizens on foreign territory.

          Unless otherwise specified, the rights granted in the US constitution apply to all people of the world regardless of where they are.

          If corporations are people as defined by citizens united, then these protections apply to foreign companies also.

            • Bartsbigbugbag
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago
              1. One can only speak for themselves. Is extremely weird to say “we support X now?”. I’m not a we, and neither are you.
              2. Nowhere did I say I supported it, the question was since when do foreign companies get rights, and my answer was merely showing a way in which they would under our current precedents.
        • bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not sucking any corporation. Many people here are licking USA ass though. In support of a shameless imperialist move.

          • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Idk, I’ve looked through a lot of comments here, and there seem to be three prevailing opinions:

            1. “No social media company is a good social media company, let it burn”
            2. “I don’t actively want to see TikTok banned, but there are literally thousands of more important things to worry about than the legal troubles of an—again— $200,000,000,000 corporation
            3. ”Nooo u force ByteDance to sell TikTok that is hypocrite and liturally the same as the Great Firewall” (it isn’t, by the way; the U.S. will never block the website no matter what happens)