• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Generally I’ve seen it rules that the overlap needs to cover >50% of the square to affect it. In which case you have the exact same coverage as before. But in this case I’d just rule that we shift the grid 45 degrees so it lines up again and move units to the closest square that aligns. I.e. don’t use geometry to try to munchkin.

    There’s a bunch of grid-based shapes that pertain to the rules of 5e as well if you need that. Also 5e fun fact: a circle or radius affect is going to look like a square since diagonal distance is not accounted for, but in Pf2e it looks closer to an actual circle.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      5e accounts for diagonal distance. Each second diagonal is 10ft. A 10ft. radius sphere spell would cover this pattern on the ground:

      OOOOOOO

      OOXXXOO

      OXXXXXO

      OXXXXXO

      OXXXXXO

      OOXXXOO

      OOOOOOO

      …lemmy formatting kills that but you get the point I hope.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I always houserule that “circles are square”, because it’s so much quicker and easier. It gets a little extreme when you do it in 3D, but I don’t overly care.

      (For fun, a double diagonal move of 5 places you at 8.66 from the start, almost 75% further than an orthangol move, but still 5 for game purposes)

    • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      but in Pf2e it looks closer to an actual circle.

      Same in PF1, and all the D&D’s before 4. I’m pretty sure most games made to be played with a battlemap have a rule for diagonals, making 4e an exception.

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would love to play theatre of the mind, but my table collectively has the spatial awareness of a barnacle.

      • tissek@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This brings us back to zones, a good middle ground. Draw rough map, or great map, and on it mark intresting combat zones. Some are separated with emptiness, others by obstacles.

        For example a tavern brawl. Zones could be the Bar, Kitchen, Common Room, Balconies, Private Rooms, Out Front and Out Back.

        Fighting on the Balconies could be tight, only one in width and with the risk of being thrown off it into the Commonroom. In the Kitchen there would be fire hazards, improvized weapons, knifes and the Stew. Not to forget other ways to spice things up in there. Around the Bar there would be some cover fighting someone on the other side, bottles to be broken and combatants to glide alond the bar for maximum mental damage.

        And so on. Make each zone memorable and with special features. Did I mention drawing it out really helps?

  • timgrant@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    A group of my players brought this up. I let them know that was fine, but the monsters would be able to return the favor.

    We decided “the weave” determines the angle of squares (no diagonals).

  • kyle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    Generally I tell players they need to pick a specific point for the cube so that it exactly fits the grid. It just keeps things more objective, speeds up combat.

    I also generally prefer more structure and strict rules for things though.

  • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I prefer the Vibes-Based Magic SystemTM, where you grip it rip it and and tolerate a little ok a decent amount of variance in order to speed things along and avoid anything resembling powegaming.

    did-someone Oh your fancy spell isn’t working exactly as you intended 100% of the time? Guess magic is mystical and imprecise and ultimately subject to the whims of indifferent gods