• TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    255
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    She’s now qualified to do 90% of my job. Unfortunately the other 10% is explaining why it works.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      124
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      There’s an anecdote that goes like this:

      An important machine in a factory stops working. No matter what they do they can’t get it to work again.

      So they bring in a specialist to solve the problem, for an agreed fee of $1000

      The guy checks the machine over and then goes and presses a specific button and the machine is back working again.

      So the factory manager goes: “All you did was press a button! Why should I pay you $1000 for pressing a button?!”

      To which the specialist answers: “Well, you see, you’re paying me just $1 to press the button. The other $999 are for knowing which button to press”.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        3 months ago

        I heard the same story when I was a kid, but it was about a boilermaker. The rest was for knowing where to tap his hammer to fix their problem.

        It’s an obviously apocryphal story with two great messages. First, don’t undervalue your expertise just because the fix was easy (I still have a problem with that). Second, if you don’t know what you’re doing don’t question the expert just because it looked easy.

        • mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          3 months ago

          I know a version with a graphics designer. They designed something in 10 minutes and asked 1000 USD for it. When confronted on why it is so expensive for just 10 minutes of work, the answer is that it’s not just the 10 minutes of work, but also the 10 years of experience that lead to this 10 minutes of work.

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s a real story!

        https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/charles-proteus-steinmetz-the-wizard-of-schenectady-51912022/

        At the beginning of the 20th century Henry Ford’s electrical engineers had issues they could not solve with a gigantic generator. Henry Ford called Steimmetz, a genius mathematician working for GE to help them.

        When he arrive at the factory he spent 2 days and night listening to the generator and scribbling on his notebook.

        After that he asked for a ladder, climbed on it, put a chalk mark on a specific spot and explain to the engineers that they needed to remove the plate and replace sixteen windings behind the plate. After that the generator worked perfectly and Ford received a $10 000 bill.

        Ford asked for an itemized bill and Steinmetz sent this

        • Making chalk mark on generator $1.
        • Knowing where to make mark $9,999.

        Ford paid the bill.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s funny reading this, because the way I heard the story was as a railroad story.

          The train engine wouldn’t run. The expert was called, he arrived, and after inspecting the train engine, knew exactly were to apply a little bit of oil to make it run again. His bill was challenged as being overly expensive, and he countered with them paying for the knowledge of where to apply to oil, not the oil itself.

          There’s like all these different versions of the same philosophy of the story

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but companies everywhere have just laid off the 10% who could do that.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    178
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    working her way through C++

    part of Digital arts curriculum

    Might be too high for this, but what??

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      121
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe part of a gaming curriculum?

      Like, “learn some code so that when the devs are crying you can make small talk?”

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          54
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I was Haskalling for that one. I need to Go and shake off the Rust, maybe work on my Lisp to make sure people React well.

          Node what I’m saying?

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not Ruby sure what you’re saying, but I dream of getting strangled by a Python that can’t C#. 🤤

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            If the devs are really exhausted and sad you can’t go wrong with bringing them a Java while they’re dealing with their latest Brainf**k . Knowing various languages helps you to C#, as long as you take good care of your eyes!

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            React well

            That can only be some sort of evil Scheme, a rather Basic one. I can’t even Assembly the proper words to describe the Brainfuck

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          C++ is still the far and ahead leader in game programming. All the tools are written in it and everyone is used to it.

          • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            C++ is an awful candidate for a first programming language to learn, at least nowadays - it is very powerful, but it’s also full of foot-guns and past a certain point the learning curve becomes a wall

            • bort@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              it’s a great candidate. It was my first “real” languages (i.e. the first language, that is not php/js)

              you have a text file. then call the compiler on it, and then you have a exe file, that you can run. It does exactly what it is supposed to do without thinking about the browser, the webserver, the JVM, or some other weirdness.

              I get, that doing “good cpp” is difficult. And using all the weird languages features is difficult. But as long as you use strings, ints, ifs, fors, you should be fine. Just don’t use generics, templates, new (keep everything on the stack), multi-inheritance, complex libraries, and it’s a nice beginner language.

              • owen@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah. My intro programming classes used C and C++ and they were great for illustrating the fundamentals. Plus I think it’s important to learn the building-blocks/history

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                Maybe it’s C that’s a good first language, though I would admit that the basic ouputting of values to stdout is more intutive in C++.

                • ebc@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  this std::cout << "hello world" bullshit is in no way intuitive. You’re using the bit-shift operator to output stuff to the console? WTF? Why 2 colons? What is cout? And then these guys go on to complain about JS being weird…

                  No, C is where it’s at: printf("hello world"); is just a function call, like all the other things you do in C.

              • Ethan@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Go is just as easy. Install the compiler, write a file, compile it, get an exe. And a lot less foot-guns.

            • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              I actually found it alot easier once I had learnt C. That way I know where all of the problems are and can use the high-level stuff to get around them, while still fundamentally understanding what is going on

              • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Oh yeah, if you know C can be way more convenient depending on the language features you care about (as long as you thread very carefully when doing type punning, which you would rarely want to).

            • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Basic C++ isn’t really confusing (if you are not handwriting makefiles). It starts to get fucky when you get into memory handling, templates, etc. I’m assuming they are only using C++ over C for basic OOP (class/structs inheritance etc).

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Not really. Pointers are almost always a bad idea - just use const refs and you’ll be fine.

              • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                If using pointers is out of the question, then why choose to learn a language with explicit memory access before anything else?

                I have yet to learn Rust, but from what I hear it’s simpler and (mostly?) memory-safe – implying that it’s generally a better first language to learn.

                • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Pointers are almost always a bad idea - but you’ll probably get a lot of mileage out of having a handful of them in a large project… there’s an impulse with new C++ devs to do everything with pointers and use complex pointer arithmetic to do weird array offset and abuse predictable layouts to access stack variables etc… pointers are fine when used with moderation.

              • Gabu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                What do you mean? Pointers are the best thing ever. It either works, or you manage to make fireworks!

    • kureta
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are lots of ways computers are used for making art. Not just video-games. For example, projection mapping, algorithmic music composition, live coding, etc.

      You can look into openFrameworks for examples of C++ in arts.

        • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I think there probably are school where the professor know c++ very well, but never bothered or too stubborn to learn/teach python.

          Unlike the top 50 to 60 schools, most schools, especially research universities, don’t care that much about teaching (in the U.S., at least).

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would argue that anyone who understands c++ can easily pick up python.

            Source: expert in both.

        • kureta
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          This was the first serious creative coding framework I’ve learned 2008 or 2010 or something. I have been in this field since then. I have seen Java, Javascript, and kotlin creative frameworks but not python and I am still as surprised as you are.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just checking an art degree guide: https://catalog.mit.edu/degree-charts/architecture-course-4-b/

      One of the classes that can be chosen is: 6.4400 Computer Graphics, which has a programming 101a/b class as a prereq (granted, it uses python instead of C++, but pretty sure they used C++ as their language-of-choice for the programming 101 language until recently).

      Given the variety of digital art (video games, VTube avatars/VR avatars, more traditional-style digital art, etc), having the tools to make those kinds of things can be useful for making responsive/interactive digital art.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m currently working in game making and a ton of tools for things like 3D model creation (such as Houdini or Substance) use some form of procedural generation where at least understanding programming concepts is important and actual programming is required to do the more advanced stuff.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m very confused as well. Some universities do have ridiculous requirements though. I was planning on being a veterinarian and had to take politics classes. I switched to IT and was required to take general chemistry.

      • mvilain@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        40 years ago at UCLA, I had to do my FORTRAN programs on punch cards submitted through the batch system. The CS/Math department (no CS department then), only offered 1 section in FORTRAN with 40 others in PASCAL. And it was taught by an Engineering professor. Why would a Chemistry major take a computer science class? Remember all those shiny machines CSI uses to do forensic analysis? They came from chem labs.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I get if that’s what you want to get into, but if I was aiming to be a Linux System Engineer (like I currently am), I’d never chemistry.

  • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve straight up ripped code from StackOverflow that worked… But I had no idea why or how it worked 😂 I taught myself Go and I’m decent at it, one of my coworkers was a former professional programmer who knew C and could fumble his way through Go. I later told him I had no idea what some of the code did because I did the old copy and paste and he just said “I knew you did” 😂

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      When someone copies from stack overflow, a reviewer’s first question should be “did you copy the question or the answer?

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh shit. That’s the secret weapon that will get me ahead of my colleagues! I can’t believe I’d never thought of it.