We’ve all heard the liberal argument “if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you’re morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler.” But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
We’ve all heard the liberal argument “if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you’re morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler.” But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
We have to keep supporting Hitler, because if he is removed from power Himmler might take his place!