• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    So whose body do you want to control based on your personal beliefs that aren’t very widely held and your gut feeling about situations that aren’t comfortable to you?

    Liberty is an emotionally difficult stance. It’s bold and demands you permit that which you do not like. You seem to love the idea of holding that stance though you struggle with actually having it. You’re just a sparkling conservative

    • CableMonster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      So when does the fetus get the rights to control their body?

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        When it can live outside of another person’s body. Just like how no matter how much I want a kidney that you promised me if you decide that you are no longer willing to undergo surgery to give it to me, even if I’m already knocked out to receive it, you can back out. You are the ultimate master of your body, but so is everyone else.

        • CableMonster
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Okay, so then you believe that a person has rights when they can survive outside of the woman. So then the humanity of a fetus depends on location of the mother because in some countries the fetus can be born much earlier due to medical technology. That is not a logical stance.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I believe that the fetus’s right to live doesn’t supersede a person’s right to not be pregnant. That is a logical and consistent stance.

            • CableMonster
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Thats not a logical stance if you dont have a logical point at which the fetus gets rights.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                At no point is any person ever required to maintain using their body to keep someone else alive. If it’s your job and you don’t do it you may need professional consequences but never jail.

                The fetus has rights but they all fall below that right of bodily autonomy.

                • CableMonster
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That is what makes pregnancy a unique situation, another person is required to keep a fetus alive. If the fetus has the right of bodily autonomy, then the consensual act of making it was the consent to carry the fetus 9 months.