• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Only at night.

        The lunar exosphere is too skimpy to trap or spread the Sun’s energy, so differences between sunlit and shadowed areas on the Moon are extreme. Temperatures near the Moon’s equator can spike to 250°F (121°C) in daylight, then plummet after nightfall to -208°F (-133°C).

        https://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/

        Which sounds like a pretty big challenge for a nuclear reactor. Maybe they only plan to put them on the poles?

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The big problem with space is overheating. Space may be cold but there is no way to get rid of that heat except for radiators. Convection doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      That was my first thought, but then my second thought was even more terrifying - how do you protect your nuclear power facility from celestial impacts? The moon must get pelted with thousands of little bits of space debris every day considering it has no atmosphere. All it would take is a basketball-sized meteorite to slam into the reactor chamber and possibly cause a meltdown.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s a challenge that people are working on for sure. Likely some kind of radiant cooling, but it’s a lot of heat.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Heat also dissipates via radiation, not just conduction. I would imagine that nuclear power on the moon won’t involve hauling a lot of liquid coolant/heat exchanger/energy transfer because liquids are wicked heavy, hauling that up to orbit and then landing it is gonna take a lot of energy. They do acknowledge that cooling is an issue they’re working on.

      Maybe some kind of RTG? I couldn’t find an article that said what the NASA contractors chose to build.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, RTGs just don’t generate the kind of power you’d need. I mean, they’re awesome for generating electricity for a long time, but just not a lot of it. No, these are fission plants.