• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      55
      ·
      9 months ago

      Correct. States simply don’t have this power. The decision was unanimous for a reason.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          *terms and conditions apply

          Always has been. States have never had free reign to do anything they want. This is one of the things they cannot do.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            9 months ago

            States already do things like bar felons from voting and only put on 3rd party candidates that meet a certain signature threshold. Or add barriers to voting, like restricting when you can vote and ID laws.

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              Pretty much how it goes. Laws affect peons: oh well. Laws affect wealthy politicians: off to SCOTUS for them to overturn it!