• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    7 months ago

    Correct. States simply don’t have this power. The decision was unanimous for a reason.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        *terms and conditions apply

        Always has been. States have never had free reign to do anything they want. This is one of the things they cannot do.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          States already do things like bar felons from voting and only put on 3rd party candidates that meet a certain signature threshold. Or add barriers to voting, like restricting when you can vote and ID laws.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            Pretty much how it goes. Laws affect peons: oh well. Laws affect wealthy politicians: off to SCOTUS for them to overturn it!