• Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe someone better at math can answer this, but is 0.25/0.5 functionally the same as 0.5/1, or simply 0.5?

    • doctordevice@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can call it whatever you want, as long as it equals 1/2 it’s the same number.

      So yes, multiplying by 2/2 to make it more intuitively obvious is perfectly valid and a good way to think about it. Most arithmetic tricks are ultimately multiplying by 1 or adding 0 just to make the problem easier to handle.

      • Leviathan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh yeah, I just meant that they said I multiplied by 2, which in my head is 2/1 but I was multiplying by 1. Just trying to be clear.

    • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think it’s easier to picture it in terms of fractions. When you divide by a fraction, you reciprocate the divisor. That is, you flip its numerator and denominator, then multiply them. In this case, we’re taking 1/4 and dividing it by 1/2. You take the reciprocal of 1/2, which is 2/1. Then multiply the numerators and denominators. You end up with (1/4)*(2/1)=2/4=1/2=0.5

    • Fellstone@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      0.25 is half of 0.5. Alternatively: A quarter is half of half. If you multiplied 0.25/0.5 by 2, then it would be 0.5/1, which is just 0.5.

        • Aleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’ve got it. The trick to working with fractions is multiplying them by fractional equivalents to one (2/2, 7/7, 13/13, etc) to change them into numbers that our monkey brains can handle more easily.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Huh, that’s a cool way to think of it. I’ve done a decent amount of higher level maths but stuff like this always cooks my brain if I let it. I thought of the numbers as the fractions 1/4 and 1/2, which then reminds me that 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4, but I think your way feels more elegant

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      I cannot comprehend how bad at math you need to be to ask this question.

      Like, 2 + 2 = 4 = 3 + 1.

      These are all equivalent. That’s what this symbol means: =

      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        There are better ways of saying this. You know, polite ways, where you don’t come across as an insecure dickhead.

      • recapitated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        That is really mean. You shouldn’t attempt to teach people anything if this is what your mindset is like.