• patatahooligan@lemmy.world
    3·
    1 year ago

    Reading up on the issue, I understand that openblas is superior to blas in performance. So if I have blas I should replace it with blas-openblas. Am I correct in this understanding?

    • odseey@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      that’s how I read it too in general, unless you want squeeze the maximum performance you can of a specific application, then you will need to benchmark each implementation, (including other options such as mkl) and see in practice which is superior for you.

      • patatahooligan@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Meh I don’t use it enough to warrant the effort of benchmarking. I just wanted a really general “if you don’t know what you want, your should probably use X”, and it appears that I should just use blas-openblas.

        • odseey@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          1 year ago

          yes definitely, I am also going to just install blas-openblas and forget about it, however I just added the part about benchmarking for people that run research/ machine-learning stuff regularly , figuring out which implementation is faster for their use case is worth it.

  • croobat@lemmy.world
    2·
    1 year ago

    Wish I could have seen this before, yesterday I spent quite a minute uninstalling, updating and reinstalling all my blas packages (Krita, Gimp, Inkscape, FreeCAD, etc).

    I reeally should be more attentive with the archlinux posts… 😂