• IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      9 months ago

      All these AI and machine learning companies are taking content directly from websites and ignoring robot.txt files.

      If your content is able to be crawled, even without being listed on search engines, I don’t think it really matters.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        It might help proof an AI company against legal issues that might be brought about by their using the content. If they’re ever sued by Automattic, then they can just point to the deal and say that they bought the data from them. There’s much less ambiguity.

        • IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You are correct, about the legal stuff. These companies are being sued all the time.

          Doing this deal also makes processing the data a lot easier. Being handed a big ass database would be a lot easier than crawling for content.

          What I posted was about how they operate. These companies showed time and time again that they don’t really care what data they are taking or from whom. They will even take their own AI or machine learning content and put it in their own system.

  • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    9 months ago

    I work in marketing, and every client I work with who has a WordPress website is using AI to write a lot of their content. This is going to lead to circularly trained AI for sure.

      • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not sure, especially since they compare it to the Squareapace deal which I believe is for all sites built on the platform.

          • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            My misunderstanding. But it looks like you need a .org to self-host WP, and like 99% of WP-built sites are .com as far as I’ve seen. I definitely do not know the technicals about different ways to host/build on the same platform, so I certainly defer to you there, but in any case, my bet is that any site/platform that gets scraped indiscriminately will lead to a lot of circular AI training.

            • harsh3466
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              There are A LOT of self hosted Wordpress sites out there. Many of them you wouldn’t know unless told they were Wordpress (I believe both The Verge and TechCrunch use self hosted Wordpress). I myself have two self hosted Wordpress sites. Though I’ve been considering moving away from Wordpress for awhile now.

              • Roldyclark@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yeah there are def more self hosted than not. Wordpress.org is just the site for the open source project. Most hosting sites come with 1 click WordPress installs. I’ve built so many sites with it.

  • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m assuming this just relates to WordPress.com rather than the open-source WordPress.org but it’s still a bummer. I’ve worked with the open source platform for over a dozen years and have started to kinda loathe what it’s turned into but I’m not sure I’m yet at the point where I’m ready to migrate a bunch of sites to something else. This could be that push if they keep going down this road.

    God, am I getting too old for this shit? I’m a pretty technical person but this AI nonsense is just relentless. I’m not philosophically against the idea of AI as like any tool it has the potential to better the world, but every tech company and their dog are going all in on using it for commercial bullshit that seems to provide very little value to society. Even fucking Mozilla is going in that direction.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Mozilla seems more towards local and privacy preserving AI Dev, no? Both are really lacking in the space IMHO

      Like I’m not interested in what the collective of digital knowledge looks like behind several corporate filters and giant rent seeking moat.

      • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        True, and I get that realistically they do need to diversify away from Firefox … but it still feels bandwagoney to me given that seemingly every tech company (and Wendy’s) are piling into the AI train all at once. Like I said, though, I think I’m just getting too old for this.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          They were already making some good work in the field before but they trended away from it.

          Honestly it just seems like they struggle with follow through.

      • kingthrillgore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Mozilla’s business is sucking up to Google for that vendor money they spend to avoid litigation (and its not working).

          • kingthrillgore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Google gives Mozilla its money to appear that they aren’t trying to corner the browser space with Chrome. If they win the argument in court they aren’t monopolizing, they don’t have to give Mozilla shit anymore.

    • Traister101@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s the new NFTs and Crypto but it’s not blatantly a scam so the companies that skipped out on those sure as shit will be hoping onto AI

    • kingthrillgore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s already several WordPress plugins to block out Generative AI. I expect the community to have a less than chipper attitude about this over Automattic.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don‘t really know what to say to cheer you up. Industrial revolutions are as important and exciting as they are painful, even dreadful to many. I’ve seen no signs of this one being different. There will be a lot of losers before we can expect wide spread benefits for society from it. The current working class will suffer great losses and will have to fight so another can reap the benefits later.

  • donuts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    Funny how all of these social media platforms that were so happy to describe themselves as “the public town square of the internet” or whatever are now claiming that they own everything that everyone ever posted. So, which is it? Because it obviously cannot be both.

  • harsh3466
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    Shit like this should be opt in by default. But no. Instead of respecting the users they count on ignorance, forgetfulness, and obfuscation for this kind of fuckery.

  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I always thought it was scummy as fuck that WordPress.org, a 501c3 nonprofit, is allowed to funnel business to WordPress.com which is a completely separate for-profit entity.

    They are even allowed to trick people into thinking they are the same by using the name and trademarks, which they explicitly state you cannot do. But wp.com gets a free pass for some reason? Scummy as fuck.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah I’ve never liked Wordpress. But it’s pretty much the defacto CMS for noobs. I always have used my own self-built CMS’s on frameworks like Laravel but it’s not really practical for non-tech people or even businesses to self develop their own CMS unless they have really specific needs.

      I’m going to be honest, I didn’t even realize that Wordpress.org existed and was a non-profit; I just thought making the source available was something they did because you can’t really not do that as PHP framework.

  • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not only am I really glad to not be on tumblr, but this further shows I shouldn’t use wordpress for my website even though there is an opensource version

    • kingthrillgore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      WordPress is either:

      • overkill for a lot of users, when static site generators do the job faster and easier
      • underkill when you have topology, data types, logic, and content pipeline challenges, for which Drupal is king but far more complex
  • LunaCtld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I welcome this change actually. Now users can clearly see what others have been saying forever: If you don’t pay for the product, you ARE the product.

    • TheImpressiveX
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you don’t pay for the product, you ARE the product.

      Well, that’s not always true. I don’t pay for Wikipedia, am I the product?

      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        With Linux you pay for support if you ever need it. Most end users will never need support, but businesses running Linux servers pay Red Hat a shit load to support them in case shit ever hits the fan. Like giving away a free car, but only certain people know how to do maintenance on it, and they all work for the manufacturer.

  • kirbowo808@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, time to delete my Wordpress account then. Gonna be a lot of content I gotta archive before then. ;-;

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    All of this is predicated on having some company that can afford to pay and wants this data. Or, the next tech bubble will just be VCs throwing money at AI companies training their models on the old internet.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    To complicate matters even further, advertising content that isn’t even owned by Automattic, including ads from an old Apple Music campaign, has also reportedly made its way into the training data set.

    The plans at Automattic have been so controversial internally, that a product manager has even started pulling his own photos off Tumblr to make sure they’re not used to train AI, according to 404.

    Generative AI has become a big business ever since OpenAI first launched ChatGPT in late 2022 and text-prompt image creators soon followed from a number of companies.

    But major publishers have complained, with some even filing lawsuits, alleging that much of the data used to train these systems was either pirated or doesn’t constitute “fair use” under existing copyright regimes.

    In response to emailed questions on Tuesday, Automattic directed Gizmodo to a new post that more or less confirmed 404 Media’s reporting, while trying to sell the move to consumers as an opportunity to “give you more control over the content you’ve created.”

    We also plan to take that a step further and regularly update any partners about people who newly opt-out and ask that their content be removed from past sources and future training.”


    The original article contains 536 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I wish I had content and data to sell :(

    Oh, wait, I do. But companies are already selling it :(

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Remember when Xitter started selling the checkmark and now every platform is rolling out something identical? What about Netflix cracking down on sharing and adding ads to their lowest tier? Yeah this is that.