• fastandcurious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I actually made a comment about this down below, it’s not a great approach in most cases, but for eg- A serial killer or a rapist, it will show what will happen if you a devalue someone else’s life

    Do you think a death penalty for netanyahu unfair, in fact not giving a death penalty is unfair to all the children and women and everyone else he has killed

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      it’s not a great approach in most cases

      Any cases.

      Do you think a death penalty for netanyahu unfair, in fact not giving a death penalty is unfair to all the children and women and everyone else he has killed

      Fair? What does fair mean? Does an execution un-kill the victims? What a ridiculous notion that any sort of punishment for a perpetrator could be “fair” for the victims.

      The death penalty is an abject failure. It has no benefits and numerous issues. Practicing barbarism can never be justice.

      • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        It doesn’t unkill the victims but it definitely will make other people think twice before they do the same thing

        • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          it definitely will make other people think twice before they do the same thing

          There is absolutely no evidence to support that assertion.

          There is no proof that the death penalty deters criminals. According to the National Academy of Sciences, “Research on the deterrent effect of capital punishment is uninformative about whether capital punishment increases, decreases, or has no effect on homicide rates.”

          US Department of Justice

          • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            I honestly don’t like to trust a country where you can get away for being a literal child rapist, but the above is just my opinion, we don’t even need evidence to know that the standard strawberry method of giving them merely some jailtime is not working either, but whatever, I am not a law expert

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              9 months ago

              I believe that most developed countries have gotten rid of the death penalty, and a big part of that is because it doesn’t work as a deterrent.

              Very few people decide whether or not to commit a crime based on the punishment. Most criminals think they won’t get caught at all, or if they do, they think they’ll get away with it in court.

              • FatCrab@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                This slightly misses the mark. The majority of crimes, including violent ones, are not committed by people performing a risk calculus. They’re done with minimal thought and more often than not in the heat of the moment. Effectively, they are not crimes that you can deter because for a crime to be deterred, the potential criminal has to assess whether it makes sense to commit the crime. This works in cases of like financial fraud and white collar crime. Someone shooting another person during an altercation, not so much.

                • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Thanks here for this comment, I feel like I see where my stance might not make sense, ofc death penalty should not be given in cases like this where emotion takes over, I am rather taking about ppl like trump and gates and Netanyahu who are completely sane, they just kill for their own benefit

                  Ppl here have assumed that just because I said ‘I see reason’ means I feel like you need to kill everyone who commits this, No, I am saying that I don’t know the exact circumstance, it might or might not be justified, I hope we can clear this up moving forward

                • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah there’s a way to deter crimes and it’s increasing the certainty of punishment. Overly severe punishment actually has an unwanted effect of increasing the severity of crimes. If a rapist is going to die if caught that incentivizes murdering the victim who is inherently a witness.

                  • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Rapists murder a lot of their victims anyway but this kinda makes sense, but it also kind of goes back to my point that the rape itself should be stopped by fear, everybody knows rape=bad, it’s just that people decide whether some jailtime is worth it or if they might be able to get away

              • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                That is my point, anyone who commits this should be always caught and be given the penalty, they should not be able to get away, no matter they are rich are poor

                • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  And what level of certainty do you need? Keep in mind uncertainty means innocents are murdered by the state and 100% certainty is difficult enough that it will generally put you into the anti capital punishment camp.

                  Also it sounds like you have a failure of understanding how the rich get out of punishment. Yes sometimes it’s like Brock Turner where it’s blatant. But other times it’s because they can afford the means to hide evidence and sow doubts. And when all else fails they’re more likely to have ins with judges or the ability to flee preemptively.

            • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              we don’t even need evidence to know

              No matter what follows this…yes, we do. You should need evidence to believe anything; understanding of course that the more extraordinary the claim, the more extraordinary the evidence needed.

              giving them merely some jailtime is not working either, but whatever

              Then imprison them for life. Guess what, life imprisonment is cheaper than the death penalty, and can be overturned if there’s an error.

              • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                Anyone who has spend a week in jail knows that life imprisonment is much much worse than death penalty

                • FatCrab@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yes, we should also be addressing the failings of our penal system(s). Unfortunately, many around the world, and clearly yourself included, are more interested in retributive “justice” than habilitative functions.

                  • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Lol one example would be a rehabilitation for many, you would save countless amount of money and lives as well and effort on jails because as i keep on saying people will think twice, why are they killing others in the first place? I also said that It should be up-to the judges, if someone is mentally ill, he should of course be offered rehab, but people who are completely sane and kill just to earn some money or whatever the hell they want should not enjoy the same leniency, lemmy loves to throw the word propaganda around but fails to acknowledge they might be a victim of it too, I maybe a victim as well, that’s why I always respect and try to understand other peoples opinions as well as long as they don’t force it on others, but never will you see me like ‘You are a murderous piece of shit’

        • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          That is the same thinking that those who own hand guns think. They think they will be safer, yet all the stats indicate other wise including all the children accidentally firing a gun and killing a family member. If risk of death was a deterrent, the USA would be among the safest place in the world.

          • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I am not saying anyone should be able to give a death penalty, the judges should be able to, not teens or children

              • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                I am not saying you should just order a public execution whenever you want, the judges should decide in which case it’s suitable, you won’t want to kill someone because they accidentally ran over someone, but for a child rapist?, make an example out of them, I am not saying everyone should have a say in whether this sort of punishment should be made or not, only judges with a lot of experience, unlike the america gun issue where anyone can just go up and buy a gun relatively easily

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I will admit that part of my mind would support making a public example of any fascist leader, but any public execution or punishment serves only to normalize that violence.

      Would I condemn anyone involved with the death of Mussolini? Absolutely not. Best of luck to any Israeli anti fascists in the right time and place.

      • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I feel like the problem is that we make emotional decisions, what might seem fair to us might not seem fair to the victims family and vice versa, I feel like I will let the authorities be the one to decide and respect it, I don’t think you normalize violence by a public execution though, instead you instill a feeling of fear in the public about what would happen if you do such a serious crime

        Taliban does a lot wrong, but I can get behind the logic on this kind of thing if I am honest, I feel instead maybe the victims family should be given a choice? Idk

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          you instill a feeling of fear in the public about what would happen if you do such a serious crime

          Do you think the members of the general public are often considering committing those kinds of crimes?

          “Gee whiz, I sure wish I could be a serial killer. Too bad they publicly executed that last serial killer, though! I’d better move to the US, where executions are done in private!”

          • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I feel you don’t understand what I am trying to say, but what I am trying is that just one example will probably drop the rate faster than bitcoins value, see places like saudi arabia where crimes are law just because of these laws existing, even if they are not enforced

            And no people won’t get violent, that’s like saying people will get violent by seeing a school shooting, it’s not like a person will get hanged everyday, atmost it might be something like every 5 years, especially if they make it somewhat negotiable with the victims family