• EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    The issue I have with this isn’t the slat itself, but that the plane took off with this entirely unmanaged. Tape is fine, even missing bolts are fine, this is not something that you’re just allowed to ignore. Deferred maintenance is never a good idea.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I didn’t see anything in the linked article about it looking like that before takeoff, though? I’m having a hard time believing that the pilot would just think “meh, it’s fine” if it was discovered during the preflight walk-around.

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        There is no way they took off with it looking like this. If you did it could cost you your license depending on the mood the local FAA office is in.

          • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Passengers on the flight said they heard and felt the vibration caused by turbulence immediately during the takeoff sequence, too soon for a bird strike. Bird strikes also don’t usually look like this.

            cw: animal death

            They’re usually either going to bounce off and leave a pink splatter or smear, or will be heavy enough that they caused more substantial damage at a single point, along with a red smear.

            We can’t rule out a bird strike without an investigation, but this doesn’t seem likely to me.