The method, known as EM Eye, can even capture images through walls, raising huge concerns about the potential for misuse.

The research, led by Kevin Fu, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Northeastern University, targets a vulnerability in the data transmission cables within most modern cameras. These cables unintentionally act as radio antennas, leaking electromagnetic information that can be picked up and decoded to reveal real-time video.

As reported by Tech Xplore, the vulnerability exists because manufacturers focus on protecting the intentional digital interfaces of cameras, such as the upload channel to the cloud, but overlook the potential for information leakage through accidental channels. “They never intended for this wire to become a radio transmitter, but it is,” Fu explains. “If you have your lens open, even if you think you have the camera off, we’re collecting.”

Cross post from https://lemmy.world/post/12081766

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      I actually use the cameras on pretty much all my devices, so disabling them would be a problem.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, unless you’re actually somebody important, it’s incredibly unlikely something like this is going to be used against you. So those covers are just more annoying than anything.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          It does take a little effort at a minimum, however, when compared to the relative real world risk it’s purely wasted. Unless of course, you’re a politician or maybe important executive for a major company.

          Keep your shit updated, ad blocking and no installing shady shit will lockout the lowest common denominator “hackers” (AKA script kiddies). All those scary articles about super advanced techniques? Yea, hackers with real skills can implement them and do some wicked shit, but they DGAF about Joe Schmo’s jack off session, they’re doing shit like targeting companies, politicians, celebrities etc things that can get them $$$$

          It’s pointless, it’s security theater that you’ve imposed on yourself and yet I’m sure you’ve complained about the pointless and annoying TSA as security theater…

          • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh so you’re pulling the “I have nothing to hide because I’m just a normal boring person” argument. Guess you need a physical person stalking you for you to understand.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re having the same mistake as the people who say “it doesn’t matter because I got nothing to hide.”

            The point of privacy is that you have control over what you want to share with others vs what you prefer to keep to yourself, be it for legal, religious or personal reasons.

    • Psiczar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The article includes dashcams and home security cameras, I definitely cover those with tape.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      well, if you want to see my ugly ass on the shitter or digging my nose without consent that much, joke’s on you, i guess