Which one do people prefer? I’ve personally found the chess.com UI to be a lot warmer and more inviting than lichess, but I’m interested to hear people’s opinions

  • dska22@lemmy.world
    15·
    2 years ago

    Lichess, definitely.

    From a technology point of view it’s superb and they have their users and chess as top priority.

  • jorge@sopuli.xyzM
    13·
    2 years ago

    Regarding the UI, I guess it is a matter of personal preference, although in lichess you have all the time controls in the front page, one click away, while chess-dot-com only has 10 min games in the front page, and for any other time control you need several more clicks.

    Lichess has unlimited puzzles, which is a huge plus (although it also a huge temptation for procrastination).

    chess-dot-com has better educational material, although nowadays there is lots and lots of high quality material elsewhere.

    I really like lichess’ open source model. But to be fair, chess-dot-com re-invest a lot in supporting tournaments and content creators, so they are also a force for good in the community.

    At the end of the day, they aren’t mutually exclusive. You can use both of them for different things.

    • dska22@lemmy.world
      9·
      2 years ago

      Note that Lichess has an amazing openings explorer, a funny and interactive learning section and a cool studies section.

      They also organized a lot of videos for learning by topic.

      Surely it feels less premium than chess.com, but that could’ve been said about Wikipedia vs Britannica.

      Lichess for me is awesome and truly promotes chess for everybody.

    • CoolbootyjamesOP
      1·
      2 years ago

      I’ve only used lichess to play with friends who don’t have chess.com accounts, and didn’t realize they had free puzzles. That’s definitely a big plus!

      I just found it a little unintuitive to add my friend and start a match with him compared to chess.com, but ultimately I agree that there is room for both to exist

    • Scarecrow59@lemmy.one
      4·
      2 years ago

      Same here, I find lichess to be a smoother experience. Although I prefer the rating system on chess.com as it seems to be more accurate to elo ratings. Overall I prefer lichess for no ads, no subscription pestering, and being entirely free.

      • Sunrosa@lemmy.world
        1·
        1 year ago

        The reason people think the Chess.com rating system is more accurate, is because it had used a more standardized default rating, and now the average on the site is closer to that of FIDE, USCF, etc. In reality, ratings are arbitrary numbers, and the only way ratings can be compared is with other ratings in the same system (site, federation). Chess.com actually uses the archaic Glicko-1, as opposed to the newer Glicko-2, which has important modifications in the realm of volatility, meaning the chance a player does something unexpected, and it leads to more accurate ratings, not less. Lichess, on the other hand, has updated to Glicko-2.

  • nephs@lemmygrad.ml
    7·
    2 years ago

    Lichess, for the reason why it exists!

    But I give it to chess.com that it does more creative things regarding the gamification and analysis around the chess game itself for the “average” chess player.

  • R7F@slrpnk.net
    6·
    2 years ago

    Lichess runs much, much lighter than Chesscom. I definitely prefer the UI for things like analysis on Chesscom, but like Lichess more overall. If nothing else the amount of free tools (and 0 ads!) makes me appreciate the ethos of Lichess more. Power to the people.

    • CoolbootyjamesOP
      2·
      2 years ago

      I think it’s just that I found the UI unintuitive when I first opened it up. It is nice to have all the different formats right there for you to select, but I found it difficult to find where to challenge a specific friend to a match, which is why I downloaded the app. Chess.com just felt more streamlined in that respect. That said, I’ve had a newfound appreciation for the app since starting this thread

  • kephalos@discuss.tchncs.de
    5·
    2 years ago

    I use lichess but never used chess.com so it’s not a comparison more that I defaulted to lichess since it’s open source.

    I am fairly amazed at what it provides though

  • flathead@quex.cc
    4·
    2 years ago

    Just a word of thanks for posting this. Hadn’t used lichess.org before but definitely prefer it - the design is no-nonsense but it has equivalent functionality to chess.com, or so it appears. The fact that it’s committed to providing free service and runs on donations seals the deal and I’ll be happy to chip in because I’m switching.

  • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    I mean we already use an open source social media platform, why not go all the way? Lichess is completely free and ad-free. The only thing Chess.com do better is the themes, but that’s about it.