I’ve always known that AV1 and Opus are more efficient than HEVC/VP9 and MP3/Vorbis, but exactly how is this achieved? Is it just a matter of more efficient compression?

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yes, it’s just more advanced compression as more and more techniques are discovered and fine-tuned.

    To give a feeling of how they work, some of the simpler tricks they use are:

    Find a polynomial function that closely matches a sound curve - storing 3183x^3 - 1/13847x^2 + 11x - 9 takes less space than one hundred consecutive frequency numbers.

    Cut out sounds that humans don’t hear. After a sharp clap, we don’t hear certain frequencies for a few tens of milliseconds.

    There are tons more, most too advanced to explain in a lemmy comment. :)

    • Vigge93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      Isn’t it also partly that as processing power increased, you could do more sophisticated compression/decompression in real time compared to previously, allowing these more complex compression algorithms to actually be viable?

      I.e. they actually knew how to do it before, they just didn’t have the power to implement it

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Processing power in general has improved, but there’s also specific sections of the cpu/gpu built dedicated to en/de-coding in those codecs. (in newer hardware).

        Less reliance on software figuring out which stream of commands to send the cpu/gpu to get the desired results, and more just handing the cpu/gpu some file data then receiving the output.