Quack

A good example of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance

This site mostly has articles that creatively rearrange parts of facts and sprinke sciency terminology to make incredible claims.

A retired physicist having a thought experiment on prehistoric remains years ago in a different context, plus some rando claiming these are man-made structures, becomes: “another hypothesis is that it was constructed by prehistoric human civilization (like described in the Silurian Hypothesis by NASA scientists)”

Software developer here. I only apply for onsite jobs if I believe I will be able to formally or informally switch to hybrid once I build some trust.

👋 samesies!

Spam.

AI generated site that re-hosts an existing game.

Example of clearly AI drivel, the instruction for the player to “explain your answer”

HOOOONK HOOOONK HOOOONK! …if you know what I mean. ;)

You may or may not be making a valid point, but you need to be clearer about who you are referring to and in which context.

Vague and does not cite sources meaningfully. The words that appear to link to sources, just link to other articles on the site.

Eagerly waiting for Tactical Breach Wizards to release…

Because the political leanings of a combat unit has zero bearing on anything. They are not in charge. They are not being allied with. They have aligned interests in fighting a greater evil.

So any attempts to pretend it matters does clearly, nakedly, come from a place of wanting to push back against supporting Ukraine’s defense.

Spot on.

Rough summary of when it is energy and effort efficient: https://xkcd.com/1924/

I am so hyped for that! We will have to think very differently on factory layout.

I think a lot of people can chill naturally instead or chilling briefly and through immense focus. Must be nice.

Bringing the ships into waters completely monitored by countries friendly to Ukraine, and surrounded by a number of launching points for sabotage actions by basically anyone.

It would be a risky move if anybody cared about their navy, or felt it was a threat.

You may be onto something.

The artist, Stonetoss, makes a career on catering to homophobia, transphobia, racism, antifeminism, all the nazi shit.

It is very much deliberate. He tends to use nazi dogwhistles to make his comics pass cursory censorship.

Sometimes he makes merely mildly hateful comics, like this. That is also a deliberate attempt to avoid censorship and spread the comics outside the nazi bubble. This is why he rebranded out of his previous comic “Red Panels” which was all nazi all the time and got banned everywhere.

When I started here, all there was was bioactive ground. Other engineers said I was daft to build a base on bioactive ground, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the bioactive ground. So, I built a second one. That sank into the bioactive ground. So, I built a third one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the bioactive ground, but the fourth one… stayed up! No, wait…

Where does that headline phrasing come from? The study does not, and does not claim to, pinpoint anything for autism.

They use mice bred for hypersensitivity, and look at which parts of those mice’s brains can be suppressed to reduce measured sensitivity to heated floors and electric shock.

They use “mice models of autism” to get an indication of where to maybe start looking on the slim chance it turns out to be similar in humans.

The mouse model may turn out to be a different kind of hypersensitivity altogether. Human brains may wire hypersensitivity very differently. The observed results may be that the mice’s reactions are different instead of weaker. Etc…

It is valid science, but a long shot away from a long shot at being applicable for autism in humans.

If you check a DragEvent’s currentTarget it will always point to some appendage of a “dom”.