Run, you fucking piece of shit. Go go go gogogogogogog!

My niece told her grandmother about her fear of getting murdered at school. Feel that fear, asshole.

  • CableMonster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am pro second amendment also, and would run from someone shooting a gun at people. What is he supposed to be doing?

      • CableMonster
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        I dont carry a gun, and my access to something is not why I am in favor of it being legal. Do you want legalized marijuana just because you want to use it or because you think everyone should be allowed to use it?

          • CableMonster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Guns are a federally protected right, and yes I would run someone that was shooting at people. You wouldnt?

              • CableMonster
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                How would you not supporting gun rights take the guns out of the hands of the shooter(s)?

                • Ironfist@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The same way it works in all other countries. Is not a coincidence that the US is the only country where gun ownership is a right in the constitution and the country #1 in school shootings.

                  • CableMonster
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    How would you get hundreds of millions of guns out of circulation without making tens of millions of law abiding americans into criminals?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you support them being legal and almost entirely unregulated? Because that is the GOP position and there is a big gulf between the two.

          I have no problem with guns being legal. Unlike Republicans, though, I don’t want them in the hands of, for example, the criminally insane.

          • CableMonster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I do support unregulated guns, but I am willing to compromise. Right now guns are extremely regulated particularly in some states, which is wrong. I think the biggest problem is that the regulations that some people want are ineffective at best.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I do support unregulated guns

              Really? So guns for toddlers? Guns for people who have been institutionalized multiple times? Guns for people who have committed treasonous acts?

              A former school shooter gets out of prison- give them a gun?

              • CableMonster
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Guns for people who have committed treasonous acts?

                This is the exact reason I support unregulated gun use, because people can claim things and then people lose rights.

                  • CableMonster
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I think the only valid point you have is that insane people shouldnt have guns; toddlers parents should be in charge of what they have access to. So if you proposition is that we only limit guns to insane people, I agree to this compromise.

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The purpose of a joint isn’t to kill people. Go ahead, say guns aren’t for killing, it’ll save a lot of back-and-forth.

          • CableMonster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I was responding to the idea I want gun rights so I can be a hero. I want people to have guns because they want guns for any variety of reasons. I want legal marijuana because people want marijuana. Both have externality and benefits.

            • voracitude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I want people to have guns because they want guns for any variety of reasons

              Everyone who takes firearms training learns that the purpose of a gun is to kill things. It is a weapon, and killing is its only purpose. Any reasons to want a weapon involve harming or killing others, or the threat thereof - even if the reason given is “protection”, it’s only protection in the context of hurting or killing someone before they hurt or kill someone else. This is why cannabis and cars are not a valid comparison.

              • CableMonster
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Guns are for a lot more than just killing. Two other obvious things are target shooting and threat deterrent. Then there is the reason to prevent tyranny.

                • voracitude@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Target shooting, to make sure you can hit what you’re aiming at. Threat deterrent, with the threat of force. “To prevent tyranny” by killing people.

                  Every reason is a derivative of causing harm. Every single one.

                  • CableMonster
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Literally people buy guns to shoot targets. Do you really think people buy 22lr to kill? I have weapons used for target practice and I no plans of shooting anything.

                    And threat deterrent is more than tyranny, people carry guns so people know they have guns so they are less likely to be attacked (at least that is teh theory).

          • CableMonster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Knives and bats are deadly weapons too, so no knives and bats?