And have we come full circle to god damn horse armor.

  • ericbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes.

    People who spend 10s of thousands of dollars on micro transactions do need help.

    Said help probably needs to come at a government level banning things that were designed in a computer lab to be digital Crack.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s such a shame that the OW1 discussion about loot boxes went nowhere in regards to giving ingame gambling the same legal framework as IRL gambling.

      • Rubanski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also kind of crazy that loot boxes were far less predatory than the current ow2 system is. It was very possible to never buy boxes and get everything. Nowadays? No chance

        • Contend6248@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I mean, they also freed me from my pain wanting to play that game, only with their shitty update, so i have to thank Blizzard.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It was possible to get everything but lets not overlook the inherently manipulative framing of either paying or making the game a second job, which cultivates a sunk cost mindset, which might once again make the player pay out of FOMO.

          There are reasonable amounts of grind that can make games fun for some people, but the length of grind and the limited timeframes for obtaining items are all geared to feed into the same monetization cycle. All of that artificially, because it’s not like any digital game has to clear their storeroom and shelves to make space for new collectibles.

          Game companies have been very sly about how they use physical real world metaphors to create justifications for their manipulative systems. Lootboxes too, because you can’t guess what’s in a closed pack… except the game keeps perfect track of what is available, what you have and what you don’t have. The only reason why anyone would get repeated lootbox items, is to lead them on and get them to waste money.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well, I’m of two minds about that.

          To a healthy person, the current system is pricier and more aggressive. Things are constantly being shoved in your face, but they’re all purchase-only, and 20€/skin is just absurd.

          But, I disagree that it’s more predatory. To a vulnerable person, the new system doesn’t elicit an addictive response, which loot boxes due to their gambling nature do.

          • Rubanski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think FOMO is quite a strong motivator for a addictive person. At least loot boxes were obtainable via playing the game. I wouldn’t say I am an excessive gamer, but I still managed to basically get everything over the span of 6 years playing the game. But now you HAVE to spend money to relieve FOMO pressure. Forcing you to spend money is quite predatory.

            • GhostMatter@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I agree with this. Overwatch 2 is FOMO galore. It stressed me out.

              With Overwatch 1, most content came back later, with exceptions for the charity skin and a few small things.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Anything that costs money to use with a randomised result should be considered gambling.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, it’s high time we shut down the kinder surprise gambling dens.

          • Caveman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I mean, yeah. Showing what Kinder toy is inside is a small price to pay for a broad stroke gambling law.

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s going to take all kids products with the idea as kinder surprise. All campaigns where you might win something for buying a product you’re going to buy anyway. All trading card games. I think there’s even an argument to be made that it would make looters, battle royales, even Minecraft as gambling because the end result of your gaming experience is random. Broadstroking all random away simply doesn’t work.

              • Caveman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Not all random events. Just anything that requires payment to activate a randomised event / prize should be forbidden for children.