• herrvogel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Have they given an explanation as to why that is? I mean why make it a fatal error that prevents compilation, when you could make it a warning and have the compiler simply skip it?

    • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Its an effort to keep large code bases clean. I think they should allow them when running go run but not when building.

      • RustyNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can see the sentiment here… Going through 100 clippy warning on Rust is just not fun… I know there’s the good old clippy --fix but I’m paranoid it breaks my code accidentally.

        Could probably have a compromise like 5 unused variables and your code don’t compile

        • Faresh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          but I’m paranoid it breaks my code accidentally

          Automated tests and version control should prevent that from being a problem, I imagine.

      • Ethan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I totally agree that it’s really annoying when debugging, but go run literally builds then executes. I think what they should do is add a build flag. So debug builds can pass that flag to get the builder to shut up, and leave it those errors enabled for production builds.

      • nutomicA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Has Google never heard of CI to perform such checks?

      • expr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or, you know, treat it as a warning like literally every other language. There’s absolutely no good reason for it to prevent a build outright, but then again, there’s not really good reasons for many of the decisions behind go.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Keep in mind that this is the same language that prefers function names ToBeLikeThis(), and the reason is that it looks different than Java.

      • fadhl3y@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Every time I think “perhaps I should give Golang another try”, it’s shit like this that keeps me noping out

        • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s two types of programming languages, the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses. Go is still my most productive language and is killer for building webservers. I basically use it as a scripting language since it’s so fast to write, compile, and execute.