I always had high hopes for SSDs to come down in price enough to rival spinning rust, but it seems we’ve hit a wall around 4TB for the time being. If HAMR drives don’t turn out to be outrageously expensive, I’ll be spinning discs in my NAS for the foreseeable

  • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 年前

    Earlier roadmaps set a goal of reaching 100TB by the end of the decade.

    Linux ISOs here I come!

    It’ll be interesting to see how reliable these things are. That’s a lot of data to store in one place and RAID rebuild times will be long.

    • setInner234@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Aren’t RAID rebuilds on 16TB drives already like a week? Maybe those HAMR drives will have two actuators, but I still don’t think that’ll speed things up much.

      • Flukemaster
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        If you have an SMR drive ZFS resilvers can take upwards of three weeks haha

        • setInner234@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          Omg don’t remind me of the SMR fiasco. I once bought an SMR drive by accident and didn’t understand why overwriting lots of small files happened at like 5kbps…I couldn’t believe it when I found out!

      • Chup@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        I recently migrated my QNAP NAS from 20TB single with a 2nd drive to RAID1. It did a rebuild that took just over 48h. Then I added another drive and migrated to RAID5. It did again just over 48h rebuild. So it’s not too bad.