Florida Senate takes up bill banning kids from having social media accounts::Critics have said the bills are unconstitutional and violate First Amendment protections.

  • Nix@merv.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    How do y’all who say this is good not realize this is a way to get everyone to have to submit their ID to prove their age and so you can be tracked even more intensely

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    Locking everything behind barbed wire is surely the solution. It has worked so well before.

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Every now and then, Florida does something I agree with. It’s always a surprise. Maybe also ban parents from making social media channels that exploit their children.

  • iterable@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Everyone will need a ID for online access… boooo…but for the kids…yeahhhhhh…will make the companies pay for it…fuck no all ISPs leave Florida and social sites block Florida. Florida is thrown back to dial up connections. Techs I know in Florida have gotten warnings if the law passes their company is leaving the state.

    • Nusm@yall.theatl.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’ll just pass another law saying that ISPs can’t leave. Problem solved! ¯_(ツ)_/¯

      • iterable@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It wont be a law cause they know it would fail in courts. They would do the same as with insurance companies leaving. We will start a investigation into this…and never hear about it again.

        • Nusm@yall.theatl.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Whatever do you mean? Certainly they made those mean ol’ insurance companies stay, didn’t they?!?

          (Just so no one misunderstands - /s)

  • theluddite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Maybe this is a hot take, but it’s really unfortunate that only the unhinged conservative lunatics are willing to have this discussion. I actually think that it’d be really healthy in a democracy to come together and exercise some agency in how we allow tech companies to access our children, if at all, but American liberals seem committed to some very broken notions of technocratic progress paired with free speech, while American conservatives are happy to throw all that away in order to have total control over their children, arriving closer to the right place for very dangerous reasons.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe this is a hot take, but it’s really unfortunate that only the unhinged conservative lunatics are willing to have this discussion.

      It’s because the US has no left wing. There are the Democrats, who are more than happy to see big corpos getting rich by exploiting people. And there are the Republicans, who basically believe the same thing, but with an extra helping of being super reactionary to any kind of societal change. Neither party would approach this question from the perspective of “what does the science say about this topic?”

  • OsrsNeedsF2P
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s no good links from the article about the actual wording of the bill, but you all realize this would probably affect Lemmy and Mastodon too, right?

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      That would very much depend on the specific implementation details. If it’s done in the same vein as pornographic content it would be as simple as adding a “If you live in Florida you must be over 18 to create an account. Click here to certify you don’t live in Florida or are over 18.” disclaimer to the account creation page. If it tries to add some kind of identity verification service that requires companies to use, then that’s a whole other problem and would effectively make it DOA.

    • testfactor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      As I get older, I’ve realized that places like here and reddit would be wildly better if everyone younger than me wasn’t allowed to use it, lol. :P

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    As far as I’m aware, it was already illegal for under 13s, no? Just not enforced in the slightest unfortunately.