Hello fellow pirates! I’m tired of having all the telegram premium ads and antifeatures in the client and I’m looking for a client that removed them even if it’s against the TOS. Any tips? I’d rather use an actual open source fork than a cracked version of the original

I’m looking for both Android and Desktop (Linux)

What I want is to remove the hateful ads in the channels and the “buy premium to unlock these emojis”, and also to be able to arrange the folders in whatever order I like, without being forced to keep the “All messages” as first

thanks in advance!

    • tubbadu@lemmy.kde.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      Thanks for the link! I’m trying to install the latest APK in the releases (which is 1y old), but when I try to log in it says “you’re using an outdated version, please update” refusing to let me log in :(

      • Daklon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, you can only use it if you where using it in the past, sadly the project seems to be abandoned.

    • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      54
      ·
      9 months ago

      No one gets to decide what i run on my device

      (Except your device’s manufacturer)

      No one gets to decide where i run my app

      (Except your cloud/SaaSS provider or proprietary app developer)

      No one gets to decide what must be deleted
      (Except your cloud/SaaSS provider or proprietary app developer)

      !I assume this was your point already, I am just agenda posting over here :3!<

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What “agenda” are you posting? You’re just nay-saying.

        Go eat hay elsewhere with that attitude.

        • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I am pointing out that user-controlled computing and user freedom is in a bad shape. That’s not nay-saying, since there’s a way forward: open hardware and offline-first/p2p software.

            • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I agree! But in at least one case the FSF’s understanding/handling of free software is ineffective: firmware. Especially with boot chain security being increasingly implemented in a user freedom hostile way, the focus as presented by the FSF is imo too narrow.

              • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The FSF’s stance is just based on our current capabilities. Most people still use proprietary operating systems. We are capable of developing free alternatives of non-free programs, even very complicated ones. But it’s not realistic to think that we can currently replace all firmware for any device if we don’t know how it works. The amount of products that have the RYF certificate is already very small. Even Librem 5 didn’t manage to get it. When it becomes easier, I’m sure they will change the requirements or add more levels.

                I’m pretty sure Libreboot contains proprietary firmware now and GNU is planning to develop an actually libre fork. So it’s silly for the developer to criticize the FSF for not being radical enough. It makes me think that the person doesn’t really believe in what they are saying.

                But then the author says they want us to have proprietary firmware packages in our systems. So they want our OSes to be less libre… They even compare not including proprietary firmware to burning books… I stopped reading after that.

                • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I am not saying that we need to replace every non-libre firmware, I am saying that not using firmware updates is hurting free software adoption and doesn’t advance user freedom.

  • Clot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    Telegraher, but be aware your account may get banned (I am a premium user tho)

    • American_Jesus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      You don’t get banned for using a fork.

      Telegram API is open, you can use any client you want, even CURL

    • tubbadu@lemmy.kde.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      apps on fdroid are all TOS-compliant, otherwise they would be removed real quick by telegram (AFAIK)

      • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        Idk which third party apps are compliant which aren’t? There is this one feg: https://f-droid.org/packages/it.belloworld.mercurygram/ Unlocks the premium app icons for free. https://f-droid.org/packages/nekox.messenger/ This one surely has a few premium features no? Unlimited accounts feg?

        Personally I just use Telegramm-FOSS since years. Not sure what the actual differences to official client are at the moment, but this one is just fine and I’m never annoyed by premium feature ads like it seems to be the case for you.

        I highly doubt that F-Droid team removes third party telegramm apps when they are against tos of telegramm. They are actually out there defending our freedom, even and especially when proprietary services do not want us to use Foss third party apps. Google does not want you to use third party apps for their services. F-Droid still out there publishing foss YouTube clients. Give them some credit instead of just assuming they suck up to big companies.

          • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Honestly I thought it was an abbreviation for “for example” and probably used it one gazillion times 😅 now that I google it it seems like “e.g.” is what I was going for.

        • Gravitywell@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because fdroid has a policy of respecting developers wishes. It’s also why you won’t find any forks of signal on there.

          Of course anyone can make their own fdroid repos and they have no control of that, but they have to be manually added

  • Southern Wolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t know if it’s the “TOS-Breaking” you’re looking for, but I’ve been using Forkgram for a while now and really appreciate the QOL improvements it has, as well as the ability to hide the Premium stuff you aren’t using.

  • Cinner@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Unigram is what you’re looking for on Desktop, not 100% sure if they have a Linux build.

        • Kazumara@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah so you didn’t actually answer OPs question, I misunderstood your intent.

          • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            This was the answer, the best telegram client is the one that says “can’t find the app” when you press on it

      • river@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        One simply does not use Telegram - founder is sketchy and it now primarily has alt-right, conspiracy and terrorist uses.

        I know some use it for trackers and to bootlick crackers, but it’s still not the best.

        • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          it now primarily has alt-right, conspiracy and terrorist uses.

          Assuming you meant “users” - I highly doubt that the users you described are even a large minority of Telegram’s user base. They’re highly publicized but that’s it.

          Telegram is just a tool. How is saying “don’t use it because terrorists use it” different from saying “don’t use a screwdriver because terrorists use screwdrivers.”

          Telegram isn’t a secure messenger like Signal, Matrix, the others you mentioned, or other e2ee options out there. It has an extremely limited secure mode that is useful if you need to have a one-off conversation, but that’s it. But if you don’t need a secure messenger and instead want something to replace Twitter, Discord, other social media, or to serve some other purpose, then it’s fine for that.

          founder is sketchy

          I’m not familiar with the folks associated with the other apps you mentioned, but Signal’s former CEO and co-founder, Moxie, is a pretty dubious character, too. Signal is anti-FOSS: you can’t use their servers if you fork the client; they won’t federate if you host your own servers; they’re opposed to being on F-Droid or even providing reproducible builds; and they have a history of failing to update their repos in a timely manner, to the point that clients built from source couldn’t even connect to their servers.

          That all said, I still use and recommend Signal.

    • tubbadu@lemmy.kde.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nekogram is just an unofficial telegram client, but (at least last time I downloaded it, a few month ago) it had the exact same limitations of the official client

      • SaltySalamander@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        They weren’t asking for the premium Telegram features. They were asking for a Telegram client without the premium ads.

  • pelletbucket@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    does revanced work on telegram? blocking ads is usually the first patch that’s put out