• polygon6121@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, I understand how it seems like I refered to the person and not the artist.

    I still don’t understand how you come to the conclusion that the net worth should be at least double? Based on what? My point is that it is extremely impressive to have a billion dollar company as is, in only a decade

    • crazyCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Her net worth could be considered or much more if you think of her like a company because her billion now is already earned cash and assets. But her brand and intellectual property will last decades automatically generating revenue basically forever.

      • polygon6121@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Taylor Swift is a business.Yes, in the future it could be higher. It depends on where the company is going. Artists get less popular over time and alot of assets would then necessitate scaling down, and be offloaded. If the person Taylor Swift decides she does not want to be associated with the business anymore it could lose alot, if she died probably the opposite would be true for a while. Yes a considerable amount of revenue would probably be coming in for the foreseeable future.

        Tldr: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. A billion dollar company is already an amazing feat and it is impressive if Taylor can keep the ball rolling at that scale.