• 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I just checked Amtrak. I can hop on a one way train from Houston to Portland. The journey takes 4 days (not counting delays) and costs $1,700.

          It’s cheaper to fly and faster to drive. Are we really to believe that companies like Ford, GM, BNSF, CSX, Union Pacific, Boeing, American Airlines, and Delta have nothing to do with this and that it’s genuinely the free market at work? Ofc not. Amtrak is a government agency. The government can and should use eminent domain to seize ownership of the entire rail network and fairly compensate the current owners for their stakes. In short, nationalize the rails.

          • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The United States has more usable rail miles than all of Europe combined. But it’s limited to freight traffic only. Amtrak has to lease time on the rails, which is why it’s pricey

            • Mirshe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              Also, “usable” does not mean “useful”. Most rail in the US is incredibly out of maintenance, and deeply limited on top speed as a result. Many trains aren’t going above 60MPH at any point in their journey not because of length or power, but because the rails (or the cars, or the engine) simply won’t allow anyone to go faster SAFELY.

              • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                No doubt, it is just funny to be that passenger rail is so out of fashion in the US that most of the population things the rails simply don’t exist, when they clearly do, in droves even. They are just privately owned and rarely shared.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            In wish the uk renationalised the rails. Privatisation of public transport was one of the worst decisions. Thanks Thatcher.

          • GrayoxOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Its more of a luxury than a convenience anywhere outside of the NE corridor. Utterly infuriating.

    • GrayoxOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It comes up as blank when i click on it.

  • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If I was rich I’d love to just live in a private multi-train car and just travel from city to city like a luxury van life. Ideally my friends would also have their own train cars.

    I’d roll into a city and hang out there for a few weeks or months (I’m sure I’d be able to throw money at someone to store my train cars) and then when I get bored, I’d hitch my cars to a new train and roll on out to a new city.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      If I was rich I’d love to just live in a private multi-train car and just travel from city to city like a luxury van life. Ideally my friends would also have their own train cars.

      Are you sure you’re not describing a Snowpiercer prequel?

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I know a lady who does that. She pays the railroad company to hitch her private car to their train and travels around. She also owns a Snow-Cat and runs around Mt. Hood with it sometimes.