• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t think your analogy works, because, as long as you know the plane’s identifier, you can just type it into a website and see where it is.

    https://planefinder.net/

    That’s all you have to do.

    How do you get that identifier for Taylor Swift’s plane? That part I don’t know and maybe that part is where her case lies, but I have a feeling she has no case or Musk would have tried the same thing.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      Anyone can write a trivially simple program to analyze license plates (or even car profiles) and feed it traffic cam footage. I’ve done that for poops and giggles (never pushed since it was sketchy). Have broadband and a few medium sized computers and you can process the entirety of a state’s traffic cameras. At which point, it is trivial to track 455M4N’s '92 buick.

      • na_th_an@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        Where can I find live traffic cameras with high enough resolution to read license plates? I’ve only seen traffic cameras with something like 320x240 max.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          You know how back in the day, Mythbusters would joke about “adding blah”? Or how a lot of chemistry and engineering youtubers won’t provide the exact specifics once they start working with a gun or something meth adjacent?

          Its one of those things where if you have the basic understanding of how these systems work, you can find it pretty trivially (or work around things). And if you don’t? Then you really don’t need to know.

          • the_inebriati
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s a lot of words to avoid saying you’re talking out your ass.

            “Yeah, I could totally tell you. Honest. Promise. No I can’t because… uh… I’d have to kill you.”

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s still not the same thing because the FAA is a federal organization and you’re talking about something you can only do in certain municipalities. Traffic camera footage is not available universally and a city may not even use them.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Hmm. Its almost like

          But I also think this is something that we need to actually consider from a legal and privacy standpoint and it is a lot more complex than that.

          Just because you can do something or it is even legal to do something doesn’t mean you “should”. That is why it is important to reassess laws and the like from time to time.