• PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    9 months ago

    Practically speaking, this means entry level jobs for a “middle” class career track are now only available to those whose parents can cover rent/commute/work supplies costs. If you can’t lean on intergenerational wealth, you’re screwed.

        • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          Honestly I’m a fan of living at home. My mother and I bring in about the same each month and rather than having to then blow a solid percentage of each paycheck paying for shelter, food, heating separate places, etc, a smaller percentage leaves the communal pot to cover these same costs, alone we’d both probably get by meagerly, but together we have enough to not really struggle.

      • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        been there for years now. as I was reading articles about how “young people are moving back in with their parents!!1!” it was actually my parents moving back in with me. As I was reading articles about “young people are financially irresponsible!!!11!!” I was covering my parents’ bills. As I was reading articles about how “young people splurge on treats!!!1!” I was budgeting for a household with 3 generations. It makes me sick the way the media talks about working class people, especially young people. I’m not even “young” any more so I see the vitriol leveled against millenials now getting leveled against zoomers.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      10% of the sample reported turning down a job due to these costs – that’s not nothing, but it’s not like this affects even close to most of that group.