ReactOS, which is referred to sometimes as the Open source Windows, has received another major update. Following wider UEFI bootability, the OS has now got an upgraded installation setup GUI.
  • ginerel@kbin.social
    34·
    11 months ago

    I immediately thought about ChatGPT or some other AI assistant with GPT in its name as an alternative to Copilot, lol.

    • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      4·
      11 months ago

      An accessibility first OS with a 100% local, low requirement LLM such as Microsoft phi-2 (fine-tuned for API calls ) would definitely be great.

      I’ve been reading norse mythology so i geuss Odin would be a fitting name for such OS.

  • allywilson@sopuli.xyz
    21·
    11 months ago

    I’ve actually thought for a while now that a big software company should come out and say they support ReactOS for whatever their product is and advertise it like “Full, Oracle 23c DB support on ReactOS - but without the Microsoft tax.”

    Yes, that’s not realistic between Oracle and MS, but it would be such a boon to ReactOS.

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      17·
      11 months ago

      I can’t tell if you’re pitching this as an MSSQL alternative or if someone forced you to work with Oracle on Windows. Either way, you poor, poor soul.

      • Daxtron2@startrek.website
        7·
        11 months ago

        When I worked for New York state they had a bunch of oracle on windows projects. It sucked. The prisoner transport system ran on MS access lol

        • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
          8·
          11 months ago

          The prisoner transport system ran on MS access lol

          This is just…Well, if you wrote a prison escape movie that involved accessing an Access DB to reroute a transport you would be laughed at.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      3·
      11 months ago

      For companies that have a legacy product depending on the old OS, but unpatched vulnerabilities because said OS is EoL, maybe this may one day be an appealing option.

  • rnd@beehaw.org
    10·
    11 months ago

    Sounds cool, though I’m a bit confused as to why that is such a big priority given that ReactOS currently aims to replicate Windows NT 5.2 (XP x64 / Server 2003), which did not provide graphical set-up*…

    * Technically all Windows versions up until, IIRC, Vista had their install process in two stages: a text-based stage where you’d input the most basic info (what filesystem to install onto, what Windows directory to use, etc.) and a graphical stage once the basic files are installed (where you’d be asked what devices the computer has, whether it’s networked, date/time, etc.). From Vista to the present day, the first stage is graphical as well. ReactOS’ latest release uses the pre-Vista model, but the latest blog posts indicate a move to the more modern one.

    • beefcat@beehaw.org
      3·
      11 months ago

      Why do you think aiming for NT 5.2 compatibility should preclude them from building a modern GUI-based installer?

  • lokiEnglish
    7·
    11 months ago

    I’m hearing a few mentions about ReactOS recently. What do people mostly use it for? It seems it’s trying to be a Windows XP clone, can it run latest browsers, which do not support old Windows versions?

    • Virulent@reddthat.com
      8·
      11 months ago

      It is more of an academic project than anything. It isn’t really useful yet and might never be.

      • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.orgEnglish
        4·
        11 months ago

        It isn’t an academic project. Its main problem is that there aren’t nearly enough developers or resources to achieve what they want - bug-to-bug compatibility with Windows.

    • pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org
      6·
      11 months ago

      Last time I checked, it could run the latest Firefox, but it might have been the ESR. It’s using a lot of the WINE stack so it should be more potent than windows xp. The main issue is drivers, not really application support

    • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
      2·
      11 months ago

      It’s not a project used by anyone for production, or even testing environments. It’s mostly just for shits and giggles at this point.

      The problem is that there weren’t enough developers able to help the project early on, and it’s taken so long to make any kind of progress, that the targets they were trying to hit are long, long past. Even if it could be something that could 100% replicate an XP/Server 2003 system, I’m not sure how much utility that would have at this point, at least in a major production environment. Might be good for enthusiasts who still play older games and can’t get a hold of an older copy of Windows. But even for production legacy systems, I can’t see a business decision where they pick a relatively unknown OS like this to replace an XP stack instead of just modernizing. They might as well just stay on XP. And big enterprises don’t choose projects like this for major deployments. They go with the tried and true solutions, regardless of cost or vendor lock-in. It’s why “Wintel” has been a thing for 30 years, and why Oracle still exists.

      I honestly don’t think it will ever be a the drop-in replacement for Windows it aims to be. If it truly got to that point of completion, MS would sue them out of existence. They’d just tie them up in court making them prove it was pure blackbox development until they ran out of money and just folded.