I’ve been using the the osmotic flow / slow method, but I’m interested to see what other people like.

  • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m careful during the initial pour to not drown the coffee. Success is when I can get the coffee wet without forcing coffee up the sides of the cone filter. I try to move the pouring water around around over the coffee when I pour to make sure that everything is getting directly hit by water. I stop pouring once the bubbles that form on top of the coffee are no longer brownish-looking. If that’s a method, then I do whatever that is called.

    • DessalinesOPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seems very close to osmotic flow… at least that’s what some ppl call it. Ya I’ve found that not drowning the coffee, and not pouring after the bubble get to the top, tastes much better.

      • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        All other things being equal (coffee quality, brewing method, grind level, etc), underextraction or overextraction is always worth keeping in mind. I never liked my grandmother’s percolator coffee because it ran water through the same coffee repeatedly. I try to use methods that, in spite of their implementation differences, put a reasonable amount of water through a sane amount of coffee a single time.