• oxjox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Public transportation is certainly an option in cities. Most suburbs I’ve been to at least have buses and ride share. Still, “most of the US” is rural and sprawling suburbs that do not have these options. If more people lived and worked in and near cities, the public transportation would have more public funding for improvements. Thankfully, this administration is looking into some very exciting improvements in our rail systems and offering more funding for cities for their own improvements. Fingers crossed.

        • oxjox
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t know how people feel the need to lie about things like this.

          You’re telling me that in the United State of America, there are cities that exist that do not have buses or subways or trollies or taxis or Ubers or bike shares? Please, tell me which city has none of these options?

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Plus all too often, buses have been the neglected stepchild of public transit and at least have the reputation of dirty, smelly, broken, crime ridden. I don’t think that’s true for the most part but there’s a psychological part to deal with, in addition to investing enough to keep things in good running order

            • oxjox
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              WTF are you going on about? We’re talking about city bus routes to get you around town. Most bus routes are at most a ten minute walk. To claim that a city bus is 30 miles away is a verifiable lie. Do you not know what a city or a bus or a mile is?

              While technically true, car and bike share aren’t publicly managed, they are affordable forms of transportation available to the public that negate the need to have a vehicle in a city.

                • oxjox
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You’re doing a really poor job of using your words to communicate whatever it is that’s on your mind. Are you having a different conversation than the rest of us?

                  You responded to me when I said I don’t need a car in a city because of all the publicly available transportation. You said “That’s great that you have that but those options don’t exist in most of the US”.

                  I said my point was that living in a city is more convenient than most of the country which is not a city.

                  You said “We’re talking about cities…” then went on to claim without a source that “Maybe 10% of those have useable public transport”.

                  You doubled down and responded to “Public transportation is certainly an option in cities.” with “Not in US cities.”

                  And now you are claiming that there are cities where the closest bus stop is 30 miles away.

                  I don’t know if a 30 mile wide city is even a thing that exists anywhere in the country let alone the fact that what you’re claiming would likely mean the city is actually 61 miles wide for someone to be 30 miles from the nearest bus.

                  Perhaps if you could be more specific about the location you have in mind we could have an intelligent conversation.