BrikoX@lemmy.zip to Framework Laptop CommunityEnglish · 8 months agoReview: Framework’s Laptop 16 is unique, laudable, fascinating, and flawedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanslinux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.dev
arrow-up1117arrow-down1external-linkReview: Framework’s Laptop 16 is unique, laudable, fascinating, and flawedarstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zip to Framework Laptop CommunityEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanslinux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.dev
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·8 months agoApparently Framework sent out a bunch of flawed test units to reviewers. That’s why some reviewers had drastically different experiences. That was an epic fail.
minus-squareGnomeComedy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoThe question is are the production run also flawed?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoLike I said, some people had much better experience than others.
minus-squaremorrowindlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoThey’re pre-production units and fw is a small company. This isn’t the first time this has happened. They’ve managed to fix the issues in the past
Apparently Framework sent out a bunch of flawed test units to reviewers. That’s why some reviewers had drastically different experiences. That was an epic fail.
The question is are the production run also flawed?
Like I said, some people had much better experience than others.
They’re pre-production units and fw is a small company.
This isn’t the first time this has happened. They’ve managed to fix the issues in the past