The disclosure comes amid congressional scrutiny and a Federal Trade Commission crackdown on commercial data brokers.

The National Security Agency buys certain logs related to Americans’ domestic internet activities from commercial data brokers, according to an unclassified letter by the agency.

The letter, addressed to a Democratic senator and obtained by The New York Times, offered few details about the nature of the data other than to stress that it did not include the content of internet communications.

Still, the revelation is the latest disclosure to bring to the fore a legal gray zone: Intelligence and law enforcement agencies sometimes purchase potentially sensitive and revealing domestic data from brokers that would require a court order to acquire directly.

It comes as the Federal Trade Commission has started cracking down on companies that trade in personal location data that was gathered from smartphone apps and sold without people’s knowledge and consent about where it would end up and for what purpose it would be used.

Non-paywall link

    • 7heo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Buying it is the exact reason they can afford not requesting a warrant.

      The logic chain is as follows:

      1. You wilfully pay for services and content with your data (you don’t pay with cash, and you keep using services that you know use your data instead)
      2. Those services do use the data as advertised (for advertisements, too)
      3. Anyone can then buy the data. Your data. It is by design, and you agreed to it.
      4. The NSA is among “anyone”. They absolutely have the right to buy the data that you sold for services. The irony in their case, is that they are using your own money, that they got though taxes, for that.

      They would not have the right to get that data otherwise. And for the most part, they probably wouldn’t get it (the amount of data generated by the surveillance capitalism is properly staggering and mind-blowing). But you sold it, and it’s fair game, so they might as well buy it with a tiny fraction of your taxes, right?

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      probably cheaper to pay for the data directly than to have to invest in engineers + infra + storage + people with the skills required to attempt to break/circumvent any layers of security.