weird case with potentially terrible ramifications for tattoo artists

  • novibe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, technically there was profit? Like you have to pay to get a tattoo, and they can get expensive. But still, this feels like it goes against even the spirit of the shitty copyright laws, so yeah…

    • viva_la_juche [they/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      True, for some reason at the time I assumed they sued the person getting the tat not Kat. But yeah I agree, people have been getting random tattoos of things forever, Miles davis has been dead for ages, everything about this feels like a cash grab. just goofy Af all around