The cost to overdraw a bank account could drop to as little as $3 under a proposal announced by the White House, the latest effort by the Biden administration to combat fees it says pose an unnecessary burden on American consumers, particularly those living paycheck to paycheck.

The change could potentially eliminate billions of dollars in fee revenue for the nation’s biggest banks, which were gearing up for a battle even before Wednesday’s announcement. Exactly how much revenue depends on which version of the new regulation is adopted.

Banks charge a customer an overdraft fee if their bank account balance falls below zero. Overdraft started as a courtesy offered to some customers when paper checks used to take days to clear, but proliferated thanks to the growing popularity of debit cards.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why are overdraft fees even allowed?

    If the account doesn’t have the funds, don’t allow the withdrawal.

    If someone needs to borrow money, they will use a credit card.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know if all banks allow it but you can turn overdrafts off and get that exact behavior. It’s hard to believe but overdraft protection was originally advertised as a feature.

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s nice that you can turn off overdraft protection but some US banks will then charge you a Non Sufficient Funds (NSF) fee when a transaction is refused because it would overdraw your account. So you get fucked either way.

    • Lesrid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      My credit union isn’t great, but one time I was $600 short on my tuition payment and they let the transaction through and gave me a call later that day and asked when I expected to pay it back. I told them two weeks and they said “okay”. I’m not even sure I was charged anything.

      • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Credit unions be cool like that, at least mine is. Still glad my parents made my account for me, I joke with them that the account is older than me (it actually is)

        • Lesrid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Good on your parents. Credit Unions can’t do everything for you that a bank can, but that’s why you just get an account with them for a specific purpose, and use the credit union for everything else.

          I was the one to liberate my parents from the fee-laden Bank of America experience.

          • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’ve just been glad to dodge most of the shenanigans I read about in this thread and what friends have told me about.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      How will the executives and top shareholders afford their private jets if you start taking away their cruelly excessive fees?

      For real though, overdraft fees are fucking evil. “Since you are now out of money, you will have to pay back even more of the money you don’t have” is just evil.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I believe it’s a holdover that originated in the limits of technology in the past. Before the Internet or even dial-up card verification, purchases were made “on faith” if writing a check or paying with a card. The fees were there to prevent banking customers from abusing the pretendness of pretend pretend money. Without the discouragement, a person may go try to buy something at multiple places, and even if a vendor called the bank to verify funds were available, each time the bank would say, “oh yeah, funds are available,” until all the paper came back to the bank.

      That being said, it’s the future, accounts can be verified and mathed upon instantly, and these fees have no place anymore, although I’m sure the banks will try and sell them as, “we’re just trying to help out the poor by allowing them needed money when they might not yet have it available, for a small convenient fee.”

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Especially since the technology of today can mess up in such interesting ways…

        My brother had enough to buy a fancy new laptop he had been saving up for, so he did, but the website goofed and accidentally processed the order TWICE… He canceled the second order and they refunded the money, but he still owed a fuckton in overdraft fees, and since the cancellation wasn’t instaneous and his bank charges him an extra fee ontop of the overdraft fee for every day his account is in the negatives…

        Yeah he was fucked for awhile

        Always use Credit for online purchases kids, the charges are far FAR easier to dispute if there’s a fuck up and it doesn’t overdraft.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      what they don’t tell you up front is that it’s up to the user to put a lock on the account so if there is no money, it stops allowing a withdrawal. And then to charge a fee as ‘overdraft protection’. But by default it’s open. It’s very shady Facebook-privacy style way of stacking it against the user just so they can make money on ignorance. Their business is to keep the user ignorant. Very end stage capitalism if scamming is defended as a business model.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Same goes for spending limits and region tracking/locking on checking accounts and associated debit cards.

        When moving from BoA to a credit union, I was astonished at how this service was enabled by default. I once purchased a large TV and got a call from the bank’s security department confirming the transaction, as I was putting it in my car. I would expect no such service from a major bank.

        • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ve gotten those calls a few times from BoA. But it’s always like 2 days after. And it’s not necesarily big purchases. I’ve gotten a TV and been fine. But I got Minecraft when that first came out, and got a call for that. One time I got a call for getting lunch at a fast food place. And these are so far and few in between that they don’t really make me feel safe. It’s more so just annoying.

          • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I honestly think it has to do with patterns and profiling. The credit transaction processing “data warehouse” middleman has a all the metadata needed to pull this off - so behaviors like fraud can be correlated across many banks and accounts.

            • Minecraft - had to purchase that internationally, if I recall correctly. From the US, that was not common back in 2010.
            • Fast food place - maybe the place already had fraud incidents there. Sometimes, restaurant employees steal card numbers.

            In my case, it was the biggest buy I had made on that card to date. Or maybe that store already had fraud problems on record.