• gnuhaut
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    It doesn’t if it’s there to wage an illegal war.

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes it does. Look up the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, if you’re not being purposefully obtuse.

      And as much as we may not like it, with the way US laws currently are, there is nothing illegal about USN vessels being in the Red Sea

      • gnuhaut
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not talking about US law. Who gives a fuck about US law? The ships are there to attack Ansarallah, so they have it coming.

        • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because, as the warships are US flagged, all that matters for their conduct (until a UN resolution is passed or ICC takes action) is US Law.

          Since the USN vessels are not within the internationally recognized jurisdiction of Yemen, Yemeni laws don’t apply. So it can’t really be illegal, then? Or is the law that no one, anywhere on earth, is allowed to disagree with them?

          • gnuhaut
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The Saudi coalition (including the US; the US navy even directly took part in the blockade) has waged war on Ansarallah for years, and created an artificial famine that killed hundreds of thousands, mostly children. The US is waging an illegal war of aggression and genocide on the people of Yemen. They don’t need a UN resolution to have the right to defend themselves.