On 25 March 2024, our account with the Berliner Sparkasse was frozen with immediate effect. In a letter, the Sparkasse informed us that it had taken this step as a precautionary measure and that we should submit numerous internal documents by 5 April to update our customer data. As a public corporation, the bank is bound by public law and may therefore not arbitrarily freeze accounts without providing an explanation, which it did not. It is also highly unusual that the required documents include a list of our members with their full names and addresses.

  • gnuhautOP
    169·
    9 months ago

    And “professional victims” is not an insult? You fucking started with the insults. And again, it’s not a business. And yes, obviously I think racists should be persecuted, and anti-racists should not. That does not make me a hypocrite. Seriously your argument is that I should not complain about political persecution (or whatever you want to call it) by a bank because banks just routinely do that?

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      67·
      9 months ago

      Banks are businesses, no matter who owns them. Even stateiest state business is - as the name implies - a business. And businesses and internal rules. It’s not “racist” either.

      Again, be angry at whoever made BDS antisemitic, not the bank.

      On a more personal note: do you really think that your childish tantrums are helping your cause? I don’t even disagree with your point, but just try to explain the reasoning behind the situation and why your critic, and that of the paper here is wrong - and you call me names. Do you think that helps? Do you think, you’ll be taken seriously like that? Foaming mouths don’t seem very convincing, even if they do have good points .

      • dankestnug420
        121·
        9 months ago

        Why are settler groups allowed to finance and collect donations without ramifications?

        I also disagree with your conflation of the founder with the overall sentiments of the group.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          45·
          9 months ago

          It’s not my conflation, it’s the “official” conflation in Germany, I wrote that several times in this thread.

          Settler groups are, as far as I know, not automatically illegal or sanctioned. If there were persons that were sanctioned, this would look different, though. Also, a newspaper is just more public. If you don’t advertise that your account is used for potentially extremist reasons, you will probably be able to fly under the radar.

      • gnuhautOP
        86·
        9 months ago

        And if your business deals with organizations that are considered extremist, banks don’t want you as a customer.

        Spot the problem? You referred to the customer, in this case a Verein, as a business. You did that twice, and I twice corrected you that it is not a business. Now you’re lecturing me on the fact that banks are businesses. Why?

        Again, be angry at whoever made BDS antisemitic, not the bank.

        I’m not conceding the point that this is “not unusual” and no political pressure was put on the bank (which you said something like you’re 100% sure about, which you could not possibly know), but for the sake of argument, let’s say for a moment that it is:

        It still makes no sense for you to call them “professional victims” for complaining about it. Like just because this is (possibly) legal for the bank to do, and they did so because of routine compliance shit and not because of pressure, does not mean it is not a political persecution. Even this scenario, they are actual real victims of political persecution, are they not?

        Also don’t fucking tone police me.

          • bloodfart
            81·
            9 months ago

            No. BDS is a pretty iffy organization and deeming them antisemitic is certainly not the best way to look at it, but definitely not completely wrong either.

            There it is.