• Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    For those who have used each, which did you prefer, GrapheneOS or a Linux-based phone, and why?

    • Samsy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I have a “braveheart” pinephone (one of the first ones) and I just use it to play around with it’s features, do distrohopping etc.)

      Most of the time i used an arch build with phosh. But actually I highly recommend postmarketOS, the installer is straight forward and let you build whatever you want. Actually I run postmarketOS edge with encrypted f2fs and gnome-mobile on it. gnome-mobile works better on newer phones but it is still usable.

      I prefer my grapheneOS phone because it is faster has more apps, apps are scaled correctly etc. Not too much battery drain…

      PS. I managed to run Thunderbird usable on pinephone, I just play around with the look&feel and now I simply have just the mail cards and I am able to interact with it without too much scaling issues.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thanks! I’ll probably go with a grapheneOS build next, I prefer battery life over most things for my use case. Thanks for the info!

        • Samsy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think Linux phones needs more time. My dream would be a phone I can plug into a docking station and work on where I stopped. Most platforms gave this dream up. But Linux is on it’s way to do it. It’s actually possible, thx to gtk4, libadwaita etc.

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s exciting! Probably not my use-case, but certainly a functional role!

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        What is the current state of Gnome mobile? I thought that it wasn’t finished yet. Is it as good as Phosh?

        PS. I managed to run Thunderbird usable on pinephone, I just play around with the look&feel and now I simply have just the mail cards and I am able to interact with it without too much scaling issues.

        Phosh comes with Geary. I haven’t used it, but it looks like it should work well on mobile.

        • Samsy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Phosh is definitely more polished and an attempt to make gtk mobile friendly. I actually prefer gnome-mobile for testing purposes. It’s exactly like gnome-desktop and apps are opened each in an workspace, which is an impressive solution. It also needs more resources, and its not recommended for the first pinephone.

          I know about Geary. But it’s not the same as a complete Thunderbird install. There I can use my smime/openpgp certs and tags are also synchronised.

      • smpl@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m curious. Is the battery in the Pinephone of lesser capacity or is the system not optimised for longevity?

        • Samsy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Or it still got old. I think its all of them.

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The SoC is not very power efficient. There aren’t many to choose from. In case of PinePhone Pro it’s a 2016 SoC running modern software.