• edward
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    lmao you went back and edited your comment to remove the part I replied to (political bias vs political alignment).

    I see nothing left in your comment that explains how that’s not what the spectrum illustrates. Here’s what you haven’t removed so far:

    all that you’ve proven is that it is, in fact, you who cannot distinguish centrism from being unbiased because you conflate the center of a bias spectrum with political centrism in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed and you’e trying to inject political alignment as a Straw man

    in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

    This part is malformed, I’m not even entirely sure what it’s supposed to say. I’ll assume this:

    in a context where the two (left and right) are the only political biases being discussed

    So you’re saying that the site just doesn’t consider centrist bias at all but only looks at left and right? Why is that? Centrist bias a form of bias too, isn’t it? Why don’t they consider centrist bias?

    • BrooklynMan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      lmao you went back and edited your comment to remove the part I replied to (political bias vs political alignment).

      you’re welcome to try to prove any wrongdoing on my part, and I’ll point to the fact that many of your comments are edited as well.

      I see nothing left in your comment that explains how that’s not what the spectrum illustrates

      I hold no surprise that you fail to comprehend something when your argument relies upon you not comprehending.

      your opinion notwithstanding, what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made-- nor can I be held responsible for such.

      • edward
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        you’re welcome to try to prove any wrongdoing on my part, and I’ll point to the fact that many of your comments are edited as well.

        Legit fucking gaslighting. You know damn well there isn’t an edit history. But I replied to the part you removed with:

        What, political bias vs political alignment?

        My edits have not removed anything like yours have.

        • BrooklynMan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Legit fucking gaslighting

          no, it’s just a rebuttal to an unproven and slanderous accusation.

          My edits have not removed anything like yours have.

          so you claim…

          • edward
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            no, it’s just a rebuttal to an unproven and slanderous accusation.

            It’s unprovable, which you know damn well. I know what I saw in your comment though and you telling me otherwise is gaslighting.

            • BrooklynMan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s unprovable, which you know damn well.

              I also know that it’s not my problem, something you should have considered before making such a claim.

              I know what I saw in your comment though and you telling me otherwise is gaslighting.

              so you claim…

              • edward
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                How about you respond to the part where I respond to what’s left of your comment?

                in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

                This part is malformed, I’m not even entirely sure what it’s supposed to say. I’ll assume this:

                in a context where the two (left and right) are the only political biases being discussed

                So you’re saying that the site just doesn’t consider centrist bias at all but only looks at left and right? Why is that? Centrist bias a form of bias too, isn’t it? Why don’t they consider centrist bias?

                • BrooklynMan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  why would i give your fallacious argument legitimacy by engaging with it?

                  your opinion notwithstanding, what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made-- nor can I be held responsible for such.

                  • edward
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made

                    Then please explain what the following means, because it isn’t proper grammar and you just called my best attempt at interpreting it “words I put in your mouth”.

                    in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed