• 133arc585
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This type of logic only makes sense in the case of public utilities, not privately owned companies.

    What do they think we’re paying for? I don’t see how the non-amortized costs (ie, non-infrastructure-buildout costs) could ever approach the amount they pull in revenue. This also ignores the fact that the telcos have gotten somewhere in the double-digit billions of dollars (iirc, around $40B) in taxpayer money to build out fiber infrastructure, that they never delivered on. What are they using this money for? What are they using their subscription revenue for?

      • 133arc585
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the correction, I almost wish I didn’t know how bad it was!

        • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it’s kinda mind blowing unfortunately. Regulatory capture really undermines the public services that our taxes are supposed to be paying for.