• BrooklynMan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    after posting about 10 of these 1gb vids from a throwaway account, it got shadowbanned. might do more later.

    • nightauthor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why did you get banned? Did you post them to /r/Noise ?
      You can’t just DoS their servers like that, but feel free to contribute noise to the appropriate sub.

      • BrooklynMan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        not banned, shadowbanned. I can post, but my posts aren’t visible to anyone else, and I get notifications that it’s happened.

        but the point isn’t for it to be seen, the point is to screw with their bandwidth and their servers. if you think that a single person uploading 1GB videos = DoS, you don’t know what DoS means.

        • nightauthor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          To your DoS statement, can you clarify by explaining what you are attempting to do with these uploads?

              • BrooklynMan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                and you really think that a single user uploading a handful of videos is capable of taking down reddit’s servers? because that’s what a DoS attack is. and if this is what you believe, you clearly don’t understand the subject you’re discussing.

                • nightauthor@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think the misunderstanding is coming from me going with the wikipedia & cloudflare definition of DoS attack, which includes intent. Image

                  And, in my opinion “the point is to screw with their bandwidth and their servers” sounds like you are intending to cause disruption (presumably by being part of a larger group of users doing the same thing), you might even call it a DDoS.

                  • BrooklynMan
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    see, the way it’s obvious that you’re trolling with bad-faith arguments is how you’ve repeatedly ignored what I’ve told you and keep trying to twist what I’ve said into a definition that it very clearly doesn’t fit.

                    i feel bad for you that you have to waste your time with silly games like this. i gave up with uploading videos to reddit about an hour after I started, realizing how pointless it was, and yet you keep up with this little charade, acting like parading your ignorance is somehow making a point.

                    you might even call it a DDoS.

                    only you are calling it that because, even though you read the definition which clearly states what i’m doing isn’t anything close to it, you can’t seem to grasp the difference between a minor annoyance and an entire corporate website becoming unavailable.