FLINT—Eight days after entering the world, Khi’Meir Taylor made another debut — this time in what could be a national spotlight.

Wednesday was the first day of a $55 million experiment to test whether cash payments can protect children from the toxic stress of poverty.

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who said anything about limiting it to parents?

    If you care for a relative you have to do all the same shit, and even if you live alone you still have to do things like cook and clean. Then if you’re really industrious there’s things like repairing your own car, mending your own clothes, growing your own food, etc.

    We all do domestic labor, even if we don’t have children. Having children would just increase the work load, and thus pay scale.

    • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, I get the sentiment, but that form of system, especially seeing how you’re explaining it, seems to create more problems than solve. How would one account for what they have done? It also seems that a system like this would be ripe for abuse.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Abuse as in, someone being paid for work they didn’t do? That’s… literally what UBI is lol

        I will say that, while I prefer domestic and reproductive labor being compensated, I acknowledge it’s not a simple problem. It would work in a highly communal society where people have very little time to themselves, since we’d all just see each other doing a good job. It would also work in a mass surveillance society since we’d all be watched 24/7, but that’s not exactly good lol

        UBI is fine. I’m just grumpy because its not perfectly fair.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          UBI is perfectly fair. The benefits to the lowest incomes is massively higher than the benefit to the wealthy while being a simple system that does not require any complex overhead to make sure the ‘right’ people are receiving it. The same as with public parks, roads, schools, fire departments, and any other public thing available to everyone that is paid through taxes.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Public parks and roads and schools and fire departments all have overhead to make sure they’re being used correctly and being used by the people who should be using them. Letting someone who literally plays video games all day draw from UBI is like letting adults continue attending public school after they graduate, or the fire department blasting a house with water when it isn’t on fire. They don’t need it.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Who is making sure the ‘right people’ use parks and public schools?

              Fire departments serve everyone when there is an emergency.

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                We don’t allow the whole community to attend social studies class, we don’t allow people to farm in the park., and the fire department doesn’t save people when there isn’t an emergency. Your libertine conception of UBI has no parallel in any public service. There’s always terms and conditions and stipulations and regulations and oversight and overhead.

                  • queermunist she/her
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Honey, you and all UBIniks just frame “the fire department helps everyone” in a dishonest way to support y’all’s point.

                    In reality, the fire department doesn’t help you unless there is a fire. It’s there if you need it, there isn’t a firefighter in your house right now just waiting for a fire to happen. You don’t need one, so you don’t get one. They’ll come when you need them and not until then.

                    In fact, in most places you would get in trouble if you repeatedly lied to the fire department to get them to show up. Why is that?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, then how is this different from UBI? Are you supposed to keep a log of what you cleaned that day?

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hypothetically, someone who literally plays video games all day and doesn’t clean up after themselves wouldn’t get any income.

        You raise a good point, though, that measuring domestic labor is hard. I spend an hour in the garden, was that because it was an hour of work or because I was working at a leisurely pace? I spent an hour vacuuming the house, is a government inspector going to come check? It’s not a practical idea unless mass surveillance gets to a point where there’s a camera in your eye that reports to the government lol

        So like I said, UBI is fine. I just wish there was a way to compensate unpaid domestic and reproductive labor. That would be more fair.