• AtemuOP
    link
    15 months ago

    It doesn’t really make sense to use torrents here. We’ve got a commercial CDN serving these files for us and they change basically every day or so.

    • @redd@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      -45 months ago

      Bittorrent has lots of benefits for the user:

      • robust stop and resume of download
      • increased download speed with using several http and torrent sources at the same time
      • downloading from peers from within the same network
      • automatic checksum calculation and redownlaod if needed

      Sorry that I asked. Seems that you feel very offensed by my question.

      • AtemuOP
        link
        25 months ago

        robust stop and resume of download

        You can stop/resume downloads via HTTP too. That’s up to the client to implement.

        increased download speed with using several http and torrent sources at the same time

        Again, this is a commercial CDN. Speed is practically infinite. Without the rather long ramp-up time too.

        downloading from peers from within the same network

        That sounds like a micro-optimisation for an edge-case.

        automatic checksum calculation and redownlaod if needed

        Not really necessary for an installer ISO downloaded via HTTPS.

        Sorry that I asked. Seems that you feel very offensed by my question.

        ???


        As mentioned, one of the reasons torrents don’t make sense here is that the ISOs change quite frequently. I don’t have exact numbers here but there’s nothing preventing them from changing every single day. The current ISO is only two days old.

        Every seeder would have to discard the old ISO and re-download an entirely new ISO every few days or so.

        Given that we need the CDN anyways, torrents just simply don’t make sense.