• novibe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You say that as it’s not a big deal.

    Do you really want to see a world without dolphins, pandas, tigers, anacondas…?

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think he’s saying it’s not a big deal for us, but for the planet.

      • novibe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I know, but that’s a very detached and unemotional take… Sure “life” will keep existing. But not the life we know. That we love. That we grew up loving so much.

        I understand not everyone feels exactly like me. But I was absurdly fascinated by biology books and wildlife documentaries and would read and watch them religiously as a child.

        Thinking of all of that just dying and ending truly breaks my heart. Almost more than anything.

        Just not as much as the thought of humanity disappearing. But I know most people share that sadness.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I also don’t think the person is unemotional, it’s more about having the correct idea of what’s actually going to happen if we don’t do anything. I also think ecology needs more rationality, otherwise we get people closing nuclear plants to restart coal plants.

          • novibe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You do know that the most well informed people (like active researchers in the field) are often the most pessimistic right? Like you hear on the media that “oh no we’re gonna pass 2º! I guess I won’t be able to ski as much”. But you go to a climate science conference and it’s “yeah… now that we can add more parameters and feedback loops into our models the chance of total extinction by 2100 is 99.99%. On the bright side, half of us expected it to be 100%. So kudos”.

    • Kalash@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’d be dead as well, so wouldn’t see them anyway.

      Also, the world is pretty cool without dinonsaurs. It will still be pretty cool with what ever comes after what we currently have.

      • novibe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t explain how knowing all the animals you grew up loving will die forever is sad. If you don’t feel it you don’t I guess.

        • Kalash@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I could imagine it if I wanted to make myself sad. But I, personally, will be dead long before even the last Panda. So it’s really just a hypothetical.

    • Anticorp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be a shame for my anaconda if we ain’t got buns, hon.