TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoApparently, it's not a gaggle.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down159
arrow-up1991arrow-down1imageApparently, it's not a gaggle.lemmy.worldTheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareSerinuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoWell, yes. Less working class people vote (as a percentage) than rich people. Also the rich people help run ads telling the working class who to vote for. And that works often enough to be effective.
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago“Well, yes. Less working class people vote (as a percentage) than rich people.” So your answer was no. So now lets get into the President. Vice President, Treasurer, Member at Large, and Secretary postions. They have the ability (as the board) to vote on a matter without the “populous” being present or having a vote. An HOA can be okay, but can take advantage of situations really quickly. Not to mention hold grudges over things for years.
Well, yes. Less working class people vote (as a percentage) than rich people.
Also the rich people help run ads telling the working class who to vote for. And that works often enough to be effective.
“Well, yes. Less working class people vote (as a percentage) than rich people.”
So your answer was no.
So now lets get into the President. Vice President, Treasurer, Member at Large, and Secretary postions.
They have the ability (as the board) to vote on a matter without the “populous” being present or having a vote.
An HOA can be okay, but can take advantage of situations really quickly. Not to mention hold grudges over things for years.