Sarcasm. They are now defending that a preemptive strike on china if they went to war with 3rd countries friendly to japan could be considered defensive.
Wtf is with that logic? If preemptive strikes are “self defense” why not just preemptively exterminate the human race? Would certainly quell all future wars.
How do you tell the difference? Weapons are weapons, you can use them for self defense or war, the physical equipment don’t know the difference.
We taking the perpetrator of one of the worst massacres in the world on the pinkie promise they won’t do it again?
Sarcasm. They are now defending that a preemptive strike on china if they went to war with 3rd countries friendly to japan could be considered defensive.
Wtf is with that logic? If preemptive strikes are “self defense” why not just preemptively exterminate the human race? Would certainly quell all future wars.
its japan trying to go around laws that forbid that