• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The problem is that you never address my point, and never make any coherent counterpoints of your own. You just keep repeating that I should read the article that I entirely agree with and that makes the exact same point I’m making. Then when I point that out, you start claiming that I omitted some context. What context did I omit, what of my points are you disputing. The only spoilt child here is you, and everyone here sees it.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      No the problem is that you always (intentionally?) fail to understand my point as you are arguing against some pro-NATO strawman that only exist in your head and when the argument doesn’t follow that pre-scripted line of thought you try to change the subject.

      You should really start practising to understand what you are reading, because apparently you have extreme confirmation bias and just selectively pick the parts you like from an article and discard the rest.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, trying again to get the last word in… I have been telling you the same for months now, just try to do some introspection.