This shouldn’t come as a huge surprise. Meta is moving forward with their plans for Theads and the Fediverse, and their adjusted terms reflect a new impending reality for Fediverse users.

  • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Public? Idk, maybe. I wouldn’t generally consider my IP to username to be public. Comment and post stuff, sort of. But even if it’s public, I still wouldn’t want Meta consuming it.

      • Oliver Lowe@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Does ActivityPub even share the user’s IP address with other nodes in the network?

        No this is not in the specification.

        A malicious instance could in theory distribute this information but it would be non-standard. Of the 2 systems I’ve studied - Mastodon and Lemmy - neither do this.

        Are they talking about your IP address or the service’s?

        In this scenario they would be talking about the IP address(es) of the services.

        • lolgcat
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Thanks for the clarification. That claim seemed really off.

          I’ve assumed that what you see publicly is basically what’s synced. Obv. your instance can have a few more meta details on you, like IP, device info, possibly all the exif they’ve stripped from uploaded photos, but these things aren’t in the ActivityPub outbox

      • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If a Threads user posts an image, and Meta hosts it, and I scroll through my feed and see it, my client will hit their server for said image. And Meta can collect my IP.

        Meta basically invented this shit.