• @Ferk
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t see where you find in my comment the assumption that people mostly follow verified accounts (if anything it’s the other way around, one of the requirements for verification is notoriety, that doesn’t mean that verification creates notoriety, nor that notoriety cannot exist without verification). Nor did I say that “enough” of them would migrate (enough for what exactly?). I was trying to be careful with my words and I used “if” when I meant “if”, not “when”.

    I was simply explaining the other view point, not necessarily saying that it will happen, but that it’s a possibility and it wouldn’t be so surprising to see an increased interest towards Twitter alternatives as a consecuence from changes like this, perhaps translating to a (small?) spike of new users exploring the fediverse (even if it’s possible most wouldn’t stay). But I don’t have a magic crystal ball so I can’t tell you what will happen.

    Your last paragraph is essentially part of what I was meaning to say in the last two lines from my previous comment. We agree.

    (and btw, it wasn’t me who gave you that downvote, to be clear)

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      11 year ago

      Right, I should’ve perhaps phrased it differently. I meant to point out that the two assumptions would have to hold in order for any sort of user migration from twitter to happen, didn’t mean to imply you were saying those would hold.