• CyclohexaneM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why do we assume the human wants to harm you? If they’re in your attic, that means they would have already killed you if they wanted.

    Chances are if you maintain peace, they will.

    • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t want random dildos hanging out in my house without my knowledge, friendly or not. At least with the roaches, I don’t have to have a conversation.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so interesting that people assume the worst of the human, unironically says something about society. I was just imagining a homeless person.

      • scubbo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I take your point, but the reasoning “this person has already demonstrated themselves willing, able, and motivated to breach a major social contract related to your safety; therefore I fear that they may try to breach more” is not unreasonable. The proportion of “home invaders who are also (willing to be) murderers” is gonna be way larger than the proportion of willing murderers among the general population.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because humans are much more sneaky and vicious than that. People like that in the real world are squatters who can and have harmed them on discovery.